tourism management | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3452 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

tourism management

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim soc
Short Name tourism management
Abbreviated Name tourism management
ISSN 0
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (94 total)

2019
Hotel employee's artificial intelligence and robotics awareness and its impact on turnover intention: The moderating roles of perceived organizational support and competitive psychological climate
Li, J.
Vol. 73 , pp. 172-181
453 views DOI
2020
Nonlinear ARDL estimation of tourism demand for Puerto Rico from the USA
Husein, J.
Vol. 77 , pp. 0-0
395 views DOI
2019
National identity and cultural festivals in postcolonial destinations
Zhang, C.
Vol. 73 , pp. 94-104
371 views DOI
2019
Management of immersive heritage tourism experiencs: A conceptual model
Bec A.
Vol. 72 , pp. 117-120
365 views DOI
2020
Western guest experiences of a Pyongyang international hotel, North Korea: Satisfaction under conditions of constrained choice
Li, F.
Vol. 76 , pp. 0-0
338 views DOI
2020
The differences in hotel selection among various types of travellers: A comparative analysis with a useful bounded rationality behavioural decision support model
Wang, L.
Vol. 76 , pp. 0-0
319 views DOI
2020
Modeling Airbnb demand to New York City while employing spatial panel data at the listing level
Gunter, U.
Vol. 77 , pp. 0-0
317 views DOI
2016
hubungan antara konsumsi serat kasar dan lemak kasar dengan kadar total solid dan lemak susu kambing peranakan ettawa
;Aisyah Nurhajah;Agung Purnomoadi;Dian Wahyu Harjanti
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 1-8
316 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bonding and dissonance: Rethinking the Interrelations Among Stakeholders in Heritage Tourism
Zhang, R.
Vol. 74 , pp. 212-223
313 views DOI
2020
Leveraging human-robot interaction in hospitality services: Incorporating the role of perceived value, empathy, and information sharing into visitors’ intentions to use social robots
de, Kervenoael R.
Vol. 78 , pp. 0-0
297 views DOI
View All 94 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.