Indexed in Journament

The British Journal of Radiology

ISSN 1748-880X· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #6,162 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
13 Articles
Scores higher than 78.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name The British Journal of Radiology
Abbreviated Name br j radiol
ISSN 1748-880X
URL https://www.birpublications.org/loi/bjr

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 42.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 12.1 5.8
Content Distribution 70.0 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (13)

2010
The contribution of 3D-CISS and contrast-enhanced MR cisternography in detecting cerebrospinal fluid leak in patients with rhinorrhoea
Algin O;Hakyemez B;Gokalp G;Ozcan T;Korfali E;Parlak M;;
Vol. 83 , No. 987 , pp. -
493 views Abstract
2019
Non-invasive classification of non-small cell lung cancer: a comparison between random forest models utilising radiomic and semantic features.
Bashir, Usman;Kawa, Bhavin;Siddique, Muhammad;Mak, Sze Mun;Nair, Arjun;Mclean, Emma;Bille, Andrea;Goh, Vicky;Cook, Gary;
Vol. 92 , No. 1099 , pp. 20190159
430 views DOI Abstract
2006
Non-visualization of the internal carotid artery with a normal ipsilateral common carotid artery Doppler waveform: a finding suggesting congenital absence of the ICA on colour Doppler ultrasound.
Yilmaz, C;Utebay, B;Kalaycioglu, S;Onat, G;Solak, A;
Vol. 79 , No. 945 , pp. e108-11
381 views Abstract
2019
Evaluation of a new image processing method for wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis: Effects on the visibility of breast lesions and breast density.
Krammer, Julia;Zolotarev, Sergei;Hillman, Inge;Karalis, Konstantinos;Stsepankou, Dzmitry;Vengrinovich, Valeriy;Hesser, Jürgen;Svahn, Tony;
, pp. 20190345
359 views DOI Abstract
2020
Histogram analysis from stretched exponential model on diffusion-weighted imaging: evaluation of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Kim, EunJu;Kim, Chan Kyo;Kim, Hyun Soo;Jang, Dong Pyo;Kim, In Young;Hwang, Jinwoo;
, pp. 20190757
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
An automated approach for the optimised estimation of breast density with Dixon methods.
Goodburn, Rosie;Kousi, Evanthia;Macdonald, Alison;Morgan, Veronica;Scurr, Erica;Reddy, Mamatha;Wilkinson, Louise;O'Flynn, Elizabeth;Pope, Romney;Allen, Steven;Schmidt, Maria Angélica;
, pp. 20190639
336 views DOI Abstract
2020
Proton therapy delivery: what is needed in the next ten years?
Schreuder, Andries N;Shamblin, Jacob;
Vol. 93 , No. 1107 , pp. 20190359
313 views DOI Abstract
2019
Artificial intelligence for precision education in radiology.
Duong, Michael Tran;Rauschecker, Andreas M;Rudie, Jeffrey D;Chen, Po-Hao;Cook, Tessa S;Bryan, R Nick;Mohan, Suyash;
, pp. 20190389
285 views DOI Abstract
2021
Comparison between skeletal muscle and adipose tissue measurements with high-dose CT and low-dose attenuation correction CT of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in elderly Hodgkin lymphoma patients: a two-centre validation
Albano D;Camoni L;Rinaldi R;Tucci A;Zilioli VR;Muzi C;Ravanelli M;Farina D;Coppola A;Camalori M;Giubbini R;Bertagna F;;
, pp. -
280 views Abstract
2019
Spect perfusion imaging versus CT for predicting radiation injury to normal lung in lung cancer patients.
Weller, Alex;Dunlop, Alex;Oxer, Adam;Gunapala, Ranga;Murray, Iain;Gray, Matthew J;Flux, Glenn D;deSouza, Nandita M;Ahmed, Merina;
Vol. 92 , No. 1101 , pp. 20190184
276 views DOI Abstract
2022
A reproducible dynamic phantom for sequence testing in hyperpolarised C-magnetic resonance.
Chowdhury, Rafat;Papoutsaki, Marianthi-Vasiliki;Müller, Christoph A;Smith, Lorna;Gong, Fiona;Bullock, Max;Rogers, Harriet;Mathew, Manju;Syer, Tom;Singh, Saurabh;Retter, Adam;Caselton, Lucy;Ryu, Jung;Oliver-Taylor, Aaron;Golay, Xavier;Bainbridge, Alan;Gadian, David G;Punwani, Shonit;
Vol. 95 , No. 1134 , pp. 20210770
124 views DOI Abstract
2021
Comparison between skeletal muscle and adipose tissue measurements with high-dose CT and low-dose attenuation correction CT of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in elderly Hodgkin lymphoma patients: a two-centre validation
Albano D;Camoni L;Rinaldi R;Tucci A;Zilioli VR;Muzi C;Ravanelli M;Farina D;Coppola A;Camalori M;Giubbini R;Bertagna F;;
, pp. -
280 views Abstract
2020
Proton therapy delivery: what is needed in the next ten years?
Schreuder, Andries N;Shamblin, Jacob;
Vol. 93 , No. 1107 , pp. 20190359
313 views DOI Abstract
2020
Automated CT registration tool improves sensitivity to change in ventricular volume in patients with shunts and drains
Yamin, G.
Vol. 93 , pp. 20190398
216 views DOI
2020
Histogram analysis from stretched exponential model on diffusion-weighted imaging: evaluation of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Kim, EunJu;Kim, Chan Kyo;Kim, Hyun Soo;Jang, Dong Pyo;Kim, In Young;Hwang, Jinwoo;
, pp. 20190757
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Spect perfusion imaging versus CT for predicting radiation injury to normal lung in lung cancer patients.
Weller, Alex;Dunlop, Alex;Oxer, Adam;Gunapala, Ranga;Murray, Iain;Gray, Matthew J;Flux, Glenn D;deSouza, Nandita M;Ahmed, Merina;
Vol. 92 , No. 1101 , pp. 20190184
276 views DOI Abstract
2019
An automated approach for the optimised estimation of breast density with Dixon methods.
Goodburn, Rosie;Kousi, Evanthia;Macdonald, Alison;Morgan, Veronica;Scurr, Erica;Reddy, Mamatha;Wilkinson, Louise;O'Flynn, Elizabeth;Pope, Romney;Allen, Steven;Schmidt, Maria Angélica;
, pp. 20190639
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Non-invasive classification of non-small cell lung cancer: a comparison between random forest models utilising radiomic and semantic features.
Bashir, Usman;Kawa, Bhavin;Siddique, Muhammad;Mak, Sze Mun;Nair, Arjun;Mclean, Emma;Bille, Andrea;Goh, Vicky;Cook, Gary;
Vol. 92 , No. 1099 , pp. 20190159
430 views DOI Abstract
2019
Artificial intelligence for precision education in radiology.
Duong, Michael Tran;Rauschecker, Andreas M;Rudie, Jeffrey D;Chen, Po-Hao;Cook, Tessa S;Bryan, R Nick;Mohan, Suyash;
, pp. 20190389
285 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of a new image processing method for wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis: Effects on the visibility of breast lesions and breast density.
Krammer, Julia;Zolotarev, Sergei;Hillman, Inge;Karalis, Konstantinos;Stsepankou, Dzmitry;Vengrinovich, Valeriy;Hesser, Jürgen;Svahn, Tony;
, pp. 20190345
359 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #6,162 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

42.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.