Sexually Transmitted Diseases | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3327 / 33,972
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Abbreviated Name sex transm dis
ISSN 1537-4521
Aim and Scope
URL http://journals.lww.com/stdjournal/pages/default.aspx
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2003
Time course of seroconversion by HerpeSelect ELISA after acquisition of genital herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) or HSV-2
Ashley-Morrow R;Krantz E;Wald A;;
Vol. 30 , No. 4 , pp. -
591 views Abstract
1999
Double-blind comparison of trovafloxacin and doxycycline in the treatment of uncomplicated Chlamydial urethritis and cervicitis. Trovafloxacin Chlamydial Urethritis/Cervicitis Study Group
McCormack WM;Dalu ZA;Martin DH;Hook EW;Laisi R;Kell P;Pluck ND;Johnson RB;;
Vol. 26 , No. 9 , pp. -
474 views Abstract
2003
Incidence and prevalence of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in persons seeking repeat HIV counseling and testing
Turner KR;McFarland W;Kellogg TA;Wong E;Page-Shafer K;Louie B;Dilley J;Kent CK;Klausner J;;
Vol. 30 , No. 4 , pp. -
445 views Abstract
1999
Measured versus self-reported compliance with doxycycline therapy for chlamydia-associated syndromes: high therapeutic success rates despite poor compliance
Bachmann LH;Stephens J;Richey CM;Hook EW;;
Vol. 26 , No. 5 , pp. -
432 views Abstract
2004
The psychosocial impact of testing individuals with no history of genital herpes for herpes simplex virus type 2
Miyai T;Turner KR;Kent CK;Klausner J;;
Vol. 31 , No. 9 , pp. -
390 views Abstract
1970
National surveillance for neonatal herpes simplex virus infections
Stone KM;Brooks CA;Guinan ME;Alexander ER;;
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. -
378 views Abstract
2018
Challenges of Rapid Plasma Reagin Interpretation in Syphilis Screening in Uganda: Variability in Nontreponemal Results Between Different Laboratories.
Hamill, Matthew M;Mbazira, Kimeze J;Kiragga, Agnes N;Gaydos, Charlotte A;Jett-Goheen, Mary;Parkes-Ratanshi, Rosalind;Manabe, Yukari C;Nakku-Joloba, Edith;Rompalo, Anne;
Vol. 45 , No. 12 , pp. 829-833
377 views DOI Abstract
1970
Herpes revisited. Still a cause of concern
Catotti DN;Clarke P;Catoe KE;;
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. -
369 views Abstract
2020
Partner notification among persons with early syphilis in Shenzhen, China, 2011-2017: implications for practice and policy.
Wang, Cheng;Zhao, Peizhen;Tang, Weiming;Smith, M Kumi;Ong, Jason J;Wong, Ngai Sze;Fu, Hongyun;Tucker, Joseph D;Zheng, Heping;Luo, Zhenzhou;Yang, Bin;
325 views DOI Abstract
1998
Compliance with doxycycline therapy in sexually transmitted diseases clinics
Augenbraun M;Bachmann L;Wallace T;Dubouchet L;McCormack W;Hook EW;;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. -
322 views Abstract
View All 18 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.