international journal of financial studies | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3196 / 33,973
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated há 2 semanas

international journal of financial studies

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexacoes
scopus doaj
Nome Abreviado international journal of financial studies
Nome Abreviado international journal of financial studies
ISSN
Objetivo e Escopo
URL
Instrucoes para Autores

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (9 total)

2017
Explaining the Number of Social Media Fans for North American and European Professional Sports Clubs with Determinants of Their Financial Value
Scelles, Nicolas;Helleu, Boris;Durand, Christophe;Bonnal, Liliane;Morrow, Stephen;
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 25-
366 views Abstract
2019
Financial innovation and financial inclusion nexus in south asian countries: Evidence from symmetric and asymmetric panel investigation
Qamruzzaman, M.
Vol. 7 , pp. 0-0
340 views DOI
2019
Investor Attention and Stock Market Activities: New Evidence from Panel Data
Padungsaksawasdi, Chaiyuth;Treepongkaruna, Sirimon;Brooks, Robert;
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 30-
335 views Abstract
2019
An Empirical Investigation of the Performance of Japanese Mutual Funds: Skill or Luck?
Pilbeam, Keith;Preston, Hamish;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 6-
302 views Abstract
2018
The Impact of Brexit on the Stock Markets of the Greater China Region
Morales, Lucía;Andreosso-O’Callaghan, Bernadette;
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 51-
299 views Abstract
2020
Impact of Capital Regulation and Market Discipline on Capital Ratio Selection: A Cross Country Study
Ahmed Imran Hunjra;Qasim Zureigat;Rashid Mehmood;Hunjra, Ahmed Imran;Zureigat, Qasim;Mehmood, Rashid;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 21-
289 views DOI Abstract
2017
analysis of in situ water velocity distributions in the lowland river floodplain covered by grassland and reed marsh habitats - a case study of the bypass channel of warta river (western poland)
;Laks Ireneusz;Szoszkiewicz Krzysztof;Kałuża Tomasz
Vol. 65 , No. 4 , pp. 325-332
264 views DOI Abstract
2020
Impact of Capital Regulation and Market Discipline on Capital Ratio Selection: A Cross Country Study
Ahmed Imran Hunjra,Qasim Zureigat,Rashid Mehmood;Ahmed Imran Hunjra;Qasim Zureigat;Rashid Mehmood;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 21-
255 views DOI Abstract
2015
Financial Reforms and Financial Fragility: A Panel Data Analysis
Iftikhar, Syed Faizan;
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 84-101
247 views Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.