Indexed in Journament

molecular informatics

ISSN 18681743· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.1 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #1,665 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
59 Articles
Scores higher than 94.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Kurzname mol inform
Abgekürzter Name molecular informatics
ISSN 18681743
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1868-1751

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for molecular informatics
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 67.8 26.4
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 10.7 4.4
Content Distribution 77.6 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (59)

2015
media and the geographies of climate justice: indigenous peoples, nature and the geopolitics of climate change
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 39–54-39–54
489 views DOI Abstract
2016
piracy as labour struggle
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 333–345-333–345
435 views DOI Abstract
2012
digital marx: toward a political economy of distributed media
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 313-333
428 views DOI Abstract
2014
playing, gaming, working and labouring: framing the con-cepts and relations
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 735–801-735–801
413 views DOI Abstract
2012
how less alienation creates more exploitation? audience labour on social network sites.
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 171-183
395 views DOI Abstract
2018
2012
facebook as a surveillance tool: from the perspective of the user
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 683-691
384 views DOI Abstract
2018
book review: revolutionary keywords for a new left by ian parker
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 41-43
366 views DOI Abstract
2018
academic/digital work: icts, knowledge capital, and the question of educational quality
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 143-158
335 views DOI Abstract
2018
2018
book review: revolutionary keywords for a new left by ian parker
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 41-43
366 views DOI Abstract
2017
the alternative to occupy: radical politics between protest and parliament
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 459-476
237 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
41.1/100 · Below Average
Ranked #1,665 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

41.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

67.8/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

77.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.