molecular informatics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#128 / 33,784
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 13 hours ago

molecular informatics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name mol inform
Abbreviated Name molecular informatics
ISSN 18681743
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (59 total)

2019
Acute Rat and Mouse Oral Toxicity Determination of Anticholinesterase Inhibitor Carbamate Pesticides: A QSTR Approach
Roy P.
, pp. 0-0
334 views DOI
2016
piracy as labour struggle
;Gavin Mueller
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 333–345-333–345
329 views DOI Abstract
2015
media and the geographies of climate justice: indigenous peoples, nature and the geopolitics of climate change
;Anna Roosvall;Matthew Tegelberg
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 39–54-39–54
325 views DOI Abstract
2017
digital lifestyles between solidarity, discipline and neoliberalism: on the historical transformations of the danish it political field from 1994 to 2016
;Morten Hjelholt;Jannick Schou
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 370-389
293 views DOI Abstract
2012
how less alienation creates more exploitation? audience labour on social network sites.
;Eran Fisher
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 171-183
291 views DOI Abstract
2018
universal alienation and the real subsumption of daily life under capital: a response to hardt and negri
;David Harvey
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 449-453
275 views DOI Abstract
2014
playing, gaming, working and labouring: framing the con-cepts and relations
;Arwid Lund
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 735–801-735–801
275 views DOI Abstract
2012
facebook as a digital public sphere: processes of colonization and emancipation
;Bjarki Valtysson
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 77-91
266 views DOI Abstract
2012
digital marx: toward a political economy of distributed media
;Andreas Wittel
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 313-333
265 views DOI Abstract
2012
new marxian times! reflections on the 4th icts and society conference “critique, democracy and philosophy in 21st century information society. towards critical theories of social media”.
;Christian Fuchs
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 114-121
262 views DOI Abstract
View All 59 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.