The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3916 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name J Obstet Gynaecol Res
Abbreviated Name j obstet gynaecol res
ISSN 1447-0756
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (11 total)

2019
Effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on obstetric outcomes within 12 months after surgery.
Karadağ, Cihan;Demircan, Sinem;Çalışkan, Eray;
405 views DOI Abstract
2020
Decline number of uterine fundal pressure maneuver in Japan recent 5 years.
Hasegawa, Junichi;Sekizawa, Akihiko;Arakaki, Tatsuya;Ikeda, Tomoaki;Ishiwata, Isamu;Kinoshita, Katsuyuki;, ;
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Investigation of the association between C677T polymorphism of the MTHFR gene and plasma homocysteine level in recurrent fetal miscarriage.
Zarfeshan Fard, Yalda;Kooshkaki, Omid;Kordi Tammandani, Dormohammad;Anani Sarab, Gholamreza;
Vol. 45 , No. 8 , pp. 1442-1447
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
Safety and efficacy of a combination of pethidine and levallorphan for pain relief during labor: An observational study.
Kinugasa, Masato;Miyake, Mayu;Tamai, Hanako;Tamura, Maki;
Vol. 45 , No. 2 , pp. 337-344
359 views DOI Abstract
2020
The diagnostic value of fetal fibronectin testing in clinical practice.
Cornelissen, Lisa G H;van Oostrum, Noortje H M;van der Woude, Daisy A A;Rolf, Christel;Porath, Martina M;Oei, S Guid;van Laar, Judith O E H;
355 views DOI Abstract
2007
Total vaginal reconstruction with combined 'Split Labia Minora Flaps' and full-thickness skin grafts.
Baytekin, Caghan;Menderes, Adnan;Mola, Fahri;Balik, Ozan;Tayfur, Volkan;Vayvada, Haluk;
Vol. 33 , No. 4 , pp. 524-8
327 views Abstract
2019
Prophylactic uterine compression sutures for addressing potential postpartum hemorrhage.
Li, Guang-Tai;Xu, Hong-Mei;Li, Guang-Rui;
322 views DOI
2019
Cervical cytology use in Portugal: Results from the National Health Survey 2014.
Rukhadze, Londa;Lunet, Nuno;Peleteiro, Bárbara;
Vol. 45 , No. 7 , pp. 1286-1295
262 views DOI Abstract
2021
Is the extent of lymphadenectomy a prognostic factor in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage II endometrioid endometrial cancer?
Cuylan, Zeliha Firat;Akilli, Huseyin;Gungorduk, Kemal;Demirkiran, Fuat;Oz, Murat;Salman, Mehmet Coskun;Sozen, Hamdullah;Celik, Husnu;Gokcu, Mehmet;Bese, Tugan;Meydanli, Mehmet Mutlu;Ozgul, Nejat;Topuz, Samet;Kuscu, Esra;Kuru, Oguzhan;Gokmen, Sibel;Gultekin, Murat;Ayhan, Ali;
Vol. 47 , No. 3 , pp. 1134-1144
246 views DOI Abstract
2021
Screening the risk factors for methamphetamine use in pregnant women not receiving prenatal care
Saysukanun P;Thephamongkhol K;Tiengladdawong P;Pooliam J;Sae Chua P;Inkasung W;;
, pp. -
222 views Abstract
View All 11 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.