Indexed in Journament

journal of further and higher education

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,310 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
11 Articles
Scores higher than 61.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of further and higher education
Abbreviated Name journal of further and higher education

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.1
Accessibility 15.0 17.9
Timeliness 50.0 19.2
Diversity 30.0 28.8
Innovation 40.0 31.2
Community Impact 30.0 13.4
Content Distribution 61.8 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (11)

2019
Perspectives from graduate students on effective teaching methods: a case study from a Vietnamese Transnational University
Yao, C.
Vol. 43 , pp. 959-974
339 views DOI
2019
International academic staff in UK higher education: campus internationalisation and innovation in academic practice
Minocha, S.
Vol. 43 , pp. 942-958
281 views DOI
2019
A new approach to high-order cognitive skills in linguistics: problem-solving inference in similarity to computer science
Shilo, G.
Vol. 43 , pp. 333-346
233 views DOI
2019
Are learning skills associated with academic emotions elicited by master’s thesis work?
Hintsanen, M.
Vol. 43 , pp. 1299-1313
227 views DOI
2019
Relations between students’ perceptions of the teaching-learning environment and teachers’ approaches to teaching: a qualitative study
Uiboleht, K.
Vol. 43 , pp. 1456-1475
189 views DOI
2020
Creating a community of inquiry in the science classroom: an effective pedagogy for teaching diverse students?
Cheung, D.
Vol. 44 , pp. 1-13
185 views DOI
2019
‘On the outside I’m smiling but inside I’m crying’: communication successes and challenges for undergraduate academic writing
Elliott, S.
Vol. 43 , pp. 1163-1180
169 views DOI
2019
What is computer-based testing washback, how can it be evaluated and how can this support practitioner research?
Johnson, M.
Vol. 43 , pp. 1255-1270
130 views DOI
2020
Teaching development leaders’ characteristics and experiences of success in research-focused universities: narratives of constraint and growth
Kanuka, H.
Vol. 44 , pp. 258-272
115 views DOI
2018
Risk factors associated with first-year students’ intention to drop out from a university in South Africa
Fourie, C.
, pp. 0-0
88 views DOI
2021
Acknowledging another face in the virtual crowd: Reimagining the online experience in higher education through an online pedagogy of care.
Burke, K., & Larmar, S.
Vol. 45 , No. 5 , pp. 601-615
13 views
2020
Teaching development leaders’ characteristics and experiences of success in research-focused universities: narratives of constraint and growth
Kanuka, H.
Vol. 44 , pp. 258-272
115 views DOI
2020
Creating a community of inquiry in the science classroom: an effective pedagogy for teaching diverse students?
Cheung, D.
Vol. 44 , pp. 1-13
185 views DOI
2019
‘On the outside I’m smiling but inside I’m crying’: communication successes and challenges for undergraduate academic writing
Elliott, S.
Vol. 43 , pp. 1163-1180
169 views DOI
2019
A new approach to high-order cognitive skills in linguistics: problem-solving inference in similarity to computer science
Shilo, G.
Vol. 43 , pp. 333-346
233 views DOI
2019
What is computer-based testing washback, how can it be evaluated and how can this support practitioner research?
Johnson, M.
Vol. 43 , pp. 1255-1270
130 views DOI
2019
Are learning skills associated with academic emotions elicited by master’s thesis work?
Hintsanen, M.
Vol. 43 , pp. 1299-1313
227 views DOI
2019
Relations between students’ perceptions of the teaching-learning environment and teachers’ approaches to teaching: a qualitative study
Uiboleht, K.
Vol. 43 , pp. 1456-1475
189 views DOI
2019
Perspectives from graduate students on effective teaching methods: a case study from a Vietnamese Transnational University
Yao, C.
Vol. 43 , pp. 959-974
339 views DOI
2019
International academic staff in UK higher education: campus internationalisation and innovation in academic practice
Minocha, S.
Vol. 43 , pp. 942-958
281 views DOI
Journament Score
36.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,310 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

30.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

61.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.