internet archaeology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#143 / 33,938
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

internet archaeology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name internet archaeology
Abbreviated Name internet archaeology
ISSN 1363-5387
Aim and Scope
URL http://intarch.ac.uk
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (16 total)

2018
an evidence-based procedure for self-management of medication in hospital: development and validation of the selfmed procedure
;Toke Vanwesemael;Tinne Dilles;Bart Van Rompaey;Koen Boussery
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 77-
423 views DOI Abstract
2017
awareness and use of mhealth apps: a study from england
;Reem Kayyali;Aliki Peletidi;Muhammad Ismail;Zahra Hashim;Pedro Bandeira;Jennifer Bonnah
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 33-
380 views DOI Abstract
2007
Joining the Dots: Continuous Survey, Routine Practice and the Interpretation of a Cypriot Landscape (with interactive GIS and integrated data archive)
Given, Michael;Corley, Hugh;Sollars, Luke;
, No. 10 , pp. -
358 views Abstract
2017
a comparison of competences for healthcare professions in europe
;Antonio Sánchez-Pozo
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 8-
348 views DOI Abstract
2017
Archaeological Map of the Czech Republic. Current state and future visions of virtual research tools in the Czech Republic
, Martin Kuna;Novák, David;, Jan Hasil;Křivánková, Dana;
, No. 43 , pp. -
322 views Abstract
2017
introducing pharmaceutical care to primary care in iceland—an action research study
;Anna Bryndis Blondal;Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong;Anna Birna Almarsdottir
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 23-
312 views DOI Abstract
2016
how do european pharmacy students rank competences for practice?
;Jeffrey Atkinson;Kristien De Paepe;Antonio Sánchez Pozo;Dimitrios Rekkas;Daisy Volmer;Jouni Hirvonen;Borut Bozic;Agnieska Skowron;Constantin Mircioiu;Annie Marcincal;Andries Koster;Keith Wilson;Chris van Schravendijk;Sandra Hočevar
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 8-
306 views DOI Abstract
2017
developing a model for pharmaceutical palliative care in rural areas—experience from scotland
;Gazala Akram;Emma Dunlop Corcoran;Alison MacRobbie;Gill Harrington;Marion Bennie
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 6-
301 views DOI Abstract
2017
are we ready to implement competence-based teaching in pharmacy education in poland?
;Agnieszka Skowron;Justyna Dymek;Anna Gołda;Wioletta Polak
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 25-
290 views DOI Abstract
2018
qualitative methods in pharmacy research
;Gisselle Gallego;Lotte Stig Nørgaard
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 79-
282 views DOI Abstract
View All 16 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.