مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان | Journament

Journal Ranking

#8541 / 33,982
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
Abbreviated Name مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (17 total)

2014
Nonlinear Analysis of Electroencephalogram in Writing-Disabled Children for a Better Understanding of Brain Functions
Parastar-Feizabadi, Mahboubeh;Yazdchi, Mohammadreza;Ghoshuni, Majid;Hashemian, Peyman;
Vol. 32 , No. 283 , pp. 558-568
663 views Abstract
2018
The Effect of Sucking Eucalyptus Lozenges on the Severity of Postoperative Coughing and Hoarseness Following Endotracheal Intubation under General Anesthesia in Orthopedic Surgeries
Nazmara, Solmaz;Nourian, Javad;Tabarraie, Yaser;Ganjloo, Javad;
Vol. 36 , No. 501 , pp. 1267-1275
547 views Abstract
2012
Effects of Massage Therapy on Physical Performance and Perceived Recovery following Acute Eccentric Exercise in Male Body Building Athletes
Teimouri, Mohsen;Kargarfard, Mehdi;Sharifi, Gholam Reza;
Vol. 29 , No. 171 , pp. -
491 views Abstract
2012
A Placebo-controlled Comparative Study of Topical Flocinolone Acetonide Ointment versus Topical 0.1% Tacrolimus Ointment in the Treatment of vitiligo Lesions of Upper Extremities
Jalali, Mir Hadi Aziz;Faghihi, Alireza;Eshghi, Hossein;
Vol. 29 , No. 173 , pp. -
405 views Abstract
2013
بررسی پلی‌مورفیسم ژنتیکی C677T در ژن MTHFR در بیماران مبتلا به میگرن در مقایسه با گروه شاهد
Hemat, Kamyar;Javanmard, Shaghayegh Haghjooy;Saadatnia, Mohammad;Rafiee, Laleh;Zandifar, Alireza;Tajaddini, Mohamadhasan;
Vol. 30 , No. 214 , pp. 1935-1941
350 views Abstract
2012
The Association between Carbohydrate Intake and Metabolic Syndrome
Shirani, Fatemeh;Azadbakht, Leila;
Vol. 29 , No. 157 , pp. 1563-1574
338 views Abstract
2018
Comparison of the Effect of Resistance Training and Lavender Fragrances on Erection Function in Men during Methadone Treatment of Opioid Dependence
Kiyani-Selmi, Ahmadreza;Badami, Rokhsareh;Taghian, Farzaneh;
Vol. 35 , No. 458 , pp. 1755-1761
325 views Abstract
2016
Evaluation of Absorbed Dose from Common Radiology Examinations in Yasuj, Iran, Using Experimental Measurement and Monte Carlo Calculations
Shahbazi-Gahrouei, Daryoush;Abdi, Mohammad Reza;Paknejad, Aghdas;Baradaran-Ghahfarokhi, Milad;
Vol. 34 , No. 371 , pp. 106-113
308 views Abstract
2019
Synthesis of Fe3O4@Au Nanosystem Functionalized with Cyclodextrin as a Nanosystem with Multimodal Diagnosis and Treatment Capabilities
Zarepour, Atefeh;Zarrabi, Ali;Larsen, Kim Lambertsen;
Vol. 37 , No. 534 , pp. 792-797
298 views Abstract
2018
feature extraction for rolling element bearing weak fault based on momeda and iceemdan
;Lei Zhao;Yongxiang Zhang;Danchen Zhu
Vol. 20 , No. 6 , pp. 2352-2362
252 views DOI Abstract
View All 17 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.