Indexed in Journament

spatium

ISSN 1450-569X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #2,318 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
57 Articles
Scores higher than 92% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name spatium
Abbreviated Name spatium
ISSN 1450-569X

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.3
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 4.3
Content Distribution 79.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for spatium
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.4
Accessibility 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 4.3 4.2
Content Distribution 79.3 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (57)

2018
modeling chemical reactions by qm/mm calculations: the case of the tautomerization in fireflies bioluminescent systems
Vol. 6 , pp. -
467 views DOI Abstract
2018
discovery of natural products as novel and potent fxr antagonists by virtual screening
Vol. 6 , pp. -
448 views DOI Abstract
2016
metal cations in g-quadruplex folding and stability
Vol. 4 , pp. -
404 views DOI Abstract
2016
The spatial planning, protection and management of world heritage in Serbia
Vol. 2016 , No. 36 , pp. 75-83
392 views Abstract
2017
photodegradation of rhodamine b over biomass-derived activated carbon supported cds nanomaterials under visible irradiation
Vol. 5 , pp. -
389 views DOI Abstract
2018
urea-doped zno films as the electron transport layer for high efficiency inverted polymer solar cells
Vol. 6 , pp. -
377 views DOI Abstract
2017
carbon domains on mos2/tio2 system via catalytic acetylene oligomerization: synthesis, structure, and surface properties
Vol. 5 , pp. -
369 views DOI Abstract
2014
insights into enzymatic halogenation from computational studies
Vol. 2 , pp. -
369 views DOI Abstract
2015
nanoparticle separation with a miniaturized asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation cartridge
Vol. 3 , pp. -
364 views DOI Abstract
2020
cationic noble-gas hydrides: from ion sources to outer space
Vol. 8 , pp. -
174 views DOI Abstract
2020
selective catalytic oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde by nitrates
Vol. 8 , pp. -
185 views DOI Abstract
2020
volatile organic compounds gas sensors based on molybdenum oxides: a mini review
Vol. 8 , pp. -
305 views DOI Abstract
2018
combined in vitro and in silico studies for the anticholinesterase activity and pharmacokinetics of coumarinyl thiazoles and oxadiazoles
Vol. 6 , pp. -
266 views DOI Abstract
2018
palladium and platinum 2,4-cis-amino azetidine and related complexes
Vol. 6 , pp. -
233 views DOI Abstract
2018
mixing time, inversion and multiple emulsion formation in a limonene and water pickering emulsion
Vol. 6 , pp. -
302 views DOI Abstract
2018
modeling chemical reactions by qm/mm calculations: the case of the tautomerization in fireflies bioluminescent systems
Vol. 6 , pp. -
467 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #2,318 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

38.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

79.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.