the international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#537 / 33,939
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

the international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name the international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Abbreviated Name the international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
ISSN 1682-1750
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.isprs.org/publications/archives.aspx
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (81 total)

2014
Evaluating the potential of consumer-grade smart cameras for low-cost stereo-photogrammetric Crop-Surface Monitoring
Brocks, S.;Bareth, G.;
Vol. XL-7 , pp. 43-49
687 views Abstract
2020
an enumeration survey on diagnostic x-ray generators and essential safety parameters in mizoram, india
;Ramesh Tiwari;Jonathan Lalrinmawia;Kham Pau
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 273-281
524 views DOI Abstract
2019
THREE-DIMENSIONAL RECORDING AND PHOTOREALISTIC MODEL RECONSTRUCTION FOR VIRTUAL MUSEUM APPLICATION – AN EXPERIENCE IN MALAYSIA
Wei, O. C.;Majid, Z.;Setan, H.;Ariff, M. F. M.;Idris, K. M.;Darwin, N.;Yusoff, A. R.;Zainuddin, K.;
Vol. XLII-2-W9 , pp. 763-771
467 views Abstract
2014
Development and Comparison of Open Source based Web GIS Frameworks on WAMP and Apache Tomcat Web Servers
Agrawal, S.;Gupta, R. D.;
Vol. XL-4 , pp. 1-5
450 views DOI Abstract
2015
Comparison of two Satellite Imaging Platforms for Evaluating Sand Dune Migration in the Ubari Sand Sea (Libyan Fazzan)
Els, A.;Merlo, S.;Knight, J.;
Vol. XL-7/W3 , pp. 1375-1380
443 views Abstract
2017
RESEARCH ON THE POSITIONING OF PROTECTION AND UTILIZATION OF HISTORIC DISTRICTS UNDER BIG DATA ANALYSIS
Zhang, J.;Zhang, J.;Huo, X.;Zheng, W.;Zheng, X.;Zhang, M.;
Vol. XLII-2-W5 , pp. 731-735
430 views Abstract
2016
A SPATIAL ANALYSIS ON GIS-HEDONIC PRICING MODEL ON THE INFLUENCE OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND HOUSE PRICE IN KLANG VALLEY, MALAYSIA
Zainora, A. M.;Norzailawati, M. N.;Tuminah, P.;
Vol. XLI-B8 , pp. 829-836
401 views Abstract
2015
MAPPING LAND COVER IN THE TAITA HILLS, SE KENYA, USING AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING AND IMAGING SPECTROSCOPY DATA FUSION
Piiroinen, R.;Heiskanen, J.;Maeda, E.;Hurskainen, P.;Hietanen, J.;Pellikka, P.;
Vol. XL-7/W3 , pp. 1277-1282
401 views Abstract
2012
PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THE COMPARISON OF SATELLITE IMAGERS USING TUZ GÖLÜ AS A REFERENCE STANDARD
Özen, H.;Fox, N.;Gürbüz, S. Z.;Gürbüz, S. Z.;Deadman, A.;Behnert, I.;Harris, P.;Yua, L.;Griffith, D.;Kaewmanee, M.;Prakobya, A.;Musana, C.;Ponzoni, F.;Lee, D.;Lee, Y.;Boucher, Y.;Viallefont, F.;Rolland, P.;Helder, D.;Leigh, L.;Thome, K.;Sterckx, S.;Knaeps, E.;Raeymaekers, D.;Henry, P.;
Vol. XXXIX-B1 , pp. 145-148
379 views Abstract
2018
PROCEDURE ENABLING SIMULATION AND IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF OPTICAL EFFECTS IN CAMERA-BASED TIME-OF-FLIGHT SENSORS
Baumgart, M.;Druml, N.;Consani, M.;
Vol. XLII-2 , pp. 83-89
357 views Abstract
View All 81 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

39.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.