Indexed in Journament

journal of biomedical informatics

ISSN 1532-0480· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
44.0 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #746 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
30 Articles
Scores higher than 97.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j biomed inform
Abbreviated Name j biomed inform
ISSN 1532-0480
URL http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-biomedical-informatics

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 83.3 26.3
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 8.6 4.3
Content Distribution 81.5 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (30)

2019
The REDCap Consortium: Building an International Community of Software Platform Partners
Paul A. Harris, Robert Taylor, Brenda L. Minor, Veida Elliott, Michelle Fernandez, Lindsay O’Neal, Laura McLeod, Giovanni Delacqua, Francesco Delacqua, Jacqueline Kirby, Stephany N. Duda;Paul A. Harris;Robert Taylor;Brenda L. Minor;Veida Elliott;Michelle Fernandez;Lindsay O’Neal;Laura McLeod;Giovanni Delacqua;Francesco Delacqua;Jacqueline Kirby;Stephany N. Duda;
Vol. 95 , pp. 103208-
584 views DOI Abstract
2019
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners
Harris PA;Taylor R;Minor BL;Elliott V;Fernandez M;O'Neal L;McLeod L;Delacqua G;Delacqua F;Kirby J;Duda SN; ;;
Vol. 95 , pp. -
548 views Abstract
2019
Game-based interventions for neuropsychological assessment, training and rehabilitation: Which game-elements to use? A systematic review.
Ferreira-Brito, Filipa;Fialho, Mónica;Virgolino, Ana;Neves, Inês;Miranda, Ana Cristina;Sousa-Santos, Nuno;Caneiras, Cátia;Carriço, Luís;Verdelho, Ana;Santos, Osvaldo;
, pp. 103287
477 views DOI Abstract
2019
An Empirical Study on Prediction of Population Health through Social Media.
Nguyen, Hung;Nguyen, Thin;Nguyen, Duc Thanh;
, pp. 103277
418 views DOI Abstract
2019
Personal health information in research: Perceived risk, trustworthiness and opinions from patients attending a tertiary healthcare facility.
Krahe, Michelle;Milligan, Eleanor;Reilly, Sheena;
Vol. 95 , pp. 103222
402 views DOI Abstract
2017
OmniPHR: A distributed architecture model to integrate personal health records.
Roehrs, Alex;da Costa, Cristiano André;da Rosa Righi, Rodrigo;
Vol. 71 , pp. 70-81
402 views DOI Abstract
2020
Adverse drug event detection using reason assignments in FDA drug labels.
Sutphin, Corey;Lee, Kahyun;Yepes, Antonio Jimeno;Uzuner, Özlem;McInnes, Bridget T;
, pp. 103552
392 views DOI Abstract
2016
A computer-human interaction model to improve the diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making during 12-lead electrocardiogram interpretation.
Cairns, Andrew W;Bond, Raymond R;Finlay, Dewar D;Breen, Cathal;Guldenring, Daniel;Gaffney, Robert;Gallagher, Anthony G;Peace, Aaron J;Henn, Pat;
Vol. 64 , pp. 93-107
387 views DOI Abstract
2020
Multiple Features for Clinical Relation Extraction: a Machine Learning Approach.
Alimova, Ilseyar;Tutubalina, Elena;
, pp. 103382
375 views DOI Abstract
2005
Using qualitative studies to improve the usability of an EMR
Rose AF;Schnipper JL;Park ER;Poon EG;Li Q;Middleton B;;
Vol. 38 , No. 1 , pp. -
369 views Abstract
2020
An Archetype Query Language interpreter into MongoDB: Managing NoSQL standardized Electronic Health Record extracts systems.
Ramos, Miguel;Sánchez-de-Madariaga, Ricardo;Barros, Jesús;Carrajo, Lino;Vázquez, Guillermo;Pérez, Santiago;Pascual, Mario;Martín-Sánchez, Fernando;Muñoz-Carrero, Adolfo;
Vol. 101 , pp. 103339
325 views DOI Abstract
2020
Building a trust-based doctor recommendation system on top of multilayer graph database.
Mondal, Safikureshi;Basu, Anwesha;Mukherjee, Nandini;
Vol. 110 , pp. 103549
314 views DOI Abstract
2020
Adverse drug event detection using reason assignments in FDA drug labels.
Sutphin, Corey;Lee, Kahyun;Yepes, Antonio Jimeno;Uzuner, Özlem;McInnes, Bridget T;
, pp. 103552
392 views DOI Abstract
2020
Clinical Concept Extraction: a Methodology Review.
Fu, Sunyang;Chen, David;He, Huan;Liu, Sijia;Moon, Sungrim;Peterson, Kevin J;Shen, Feichen;Wang, Liwei;Wang, Yanshan;Wen, Andrew;Zhao, Yiqing;Sohn, Sunghwan;Liu, Hongfang;
, pp. 103526
345 views DOI Abstract
2020
CoMNRank: an integrated approach to extract and prioritize human microbial metabolites from MEDLINE records.
Wang, QuanQiu;Xu, Rong;
, pp. 103524
333 views DOI Abstract
2020
Multiple Features for Clinical Relation Extraction: a Machine Learning Approach.
Alimova, Ilseyar;Tutubalina, Elena;
, pp. 103382
375 views DOI Abstract
2020
Identifying sub-phenotypes of acute kidney injury using structured and unstructured electronic health record data with memory networks.
Xu, Zhenxing;Chou, Jingyuan;Zhang, Xi Sheryl;Luo, Yuan;Isakova, Tamara;Adekkanattu, Prakash;Ancker, Jessica S;Jiang, Guoqian;Kiefer, Richard C;Pacheco, Jennifer A;Rasmussen, Luke V;Pathak, Jyotishman;Wang, Fei;
Vol. 102 , pp. 103361
327 views DOI Abstract
2020
TreC platform. An integrated and evolving care model for patients' empowerment and data repository.
Eccher, Claudio;Gios, Lorenzo;Zanutto, Alberto;Bizzarri, Giancarlo;Conforti, Diego;Forti, Stefano;
Vol. 102 , pp. 103359
286 views DOI Abstract
2020
SECNLP: A survey of embeddings in clinical natural language processing
Kalyan, K.
Vol. 101 , pp. 0-0
220 views DOI
2020
Task definition, annotated dataset, and supervised natural language processing models for symptom extraction from unstructured clinical notes
Steinkamp, J.
Vol. 102 , pp. 0-0
231 views DOI
Journament Score
44.0/100 · Below Average
Ranked #746 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

44.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

83.3/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

81.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.