Indexed in Journament

eurasip journal on image and video processing

ISSN 1687-5176· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #16,529 of 29,297 scored journals (34,016 indexed)
37 Articles
Scores higher than 43.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name eurasip j image video process
Abbreviated Name eurasip journal on image and video processing
ISSN 1687-5176
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/13640

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for eurasip journal on image and video processing
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.5
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 50.0 26.4
Innovation 37.5 24.1
Community Impact 8.6 4.5
Content Distribution 52.1 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (37)

2018
A smart intraocular pressure risk assessment framework using frontal eye image analysis
Vol. 2018 , No. 1 , pp. 1-15
857 views Abstract
2018
The strategy of digital scenic area planning from the perspective of intangible cultural heritage protection
Vol. 2018 , No. 1 , pp. 1-11
839 views Abstract
2018
Real-time obstacle avoidance of mobile robots using state-dependent Riccati equation approach
Vol. 2018 , No. 1 , pp. 1-13
676 views Abstract
2019
Face recognition with Bayesian convolutional networks for robust surveillance systems
Vol. 2019 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
547 views Abstract
2008
Video Tracking in Complex Scenes for Surveillance Applications
Vol. 2008 , No. 1 , pp. 659098-
387 views
2018
Semi-supervised spatio-temporal CNN for recognition of surgical workflow
Vol. 2018 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
365 views Abstract
2007
Image and Video for Hearing Impaired People
Vol. 2007 , No. 1 , pp. 045641-
326 views Abstract
2019
Efficient single image dehazing by modifying the dark channel prior
Vol. 2019 , pp. 0-0
153 views DOI
2019
Design of two-wheel self-balancing vehicle based on visual identification
Vol. 2019 , No. 1 , pp. 1-21
205 views Abstract
2019
Face recognition with Bayesian convolutional networks for robust surveillance systems
Vol. 2019 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
547 views Abstract
2018
Real-time obstacle avoidance of mobile robots using state-dependent Riccati equation approach
Vol. 2018 , No. 1 , pp. 1-13
676 views Abstract
Journament Score
30.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #16,529 of 29,297 scored
(34,016 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

30.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

50.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

37.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

52.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.