Indexed in Journament

the journal of medical practice management : mpm

ISSN 8755-0229· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
43.8 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #534 of 33,995 indexed journals
4 Articles
Accessibility 35
Engagement 31
The Journament Score combines content quality, publication ethics and transparency, editorial standards, publication regularity, accessibility and reader engagement into a single 0–100 figure. It is recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed.

About This Journal

Short Name j med pract manage
Abbreviated Name j med pract manage
ISSN 8755-0229
URL http://www.greenbranch.com/section_47_MPM-Journal.cfm

Publications Per Year

Articles (4)

2017
Seven Deadly Sins of a Medical Practice.
Baum, Neil;
Vol. 32 , No. 5 , pp. 336-339
327 views Abstract
Doctors going mobile.
Romano, Ron;Baum, Neil;
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 144-7
302 views Abstract
Why banks say NO to great healthcare practitioners. Five reasons why banks reject loans to quality small-business owners and what you can do about it.
Warrick, Cheree;
Vol. 29 , No. 6 , pp. 380-2
247 views Abstract
Establishing patient contracts: as easy as ABC.
Valenzuela, Peter;
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 199-202
217 views Abstract
2017
Seven Deadly Sins of a Medical Practice.
Baum, Neil;
Vol. 32 , No. 5 , pp. 336-339
327 views Abstract
Doctors going mobile.
Romano, Ron;Baum, Neil;
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 144-7
302 views Abstract
Establishing patient contracts: as easy as ABC.
Valenzuela, Peter;
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 199-202
217 views Abstract
Why banks say NO to great healthcare practitioners. Five reasons why banks reject loans to quality small-business owners and what you can do about it.
Warrick, Cheree;
Vol. 29 , No. 6 , pp. 380-2
247 views Abstract
Journament Score
43.8/100 · Below Average
Ranked #534 of 33,995
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.