Indexed in Journament

applied network science

ISSN 2364-8228· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.8/100
Journament Score
#6,180
Journament Rank
14
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name appl netw sci
Abbreviated Name applied network science
ISSN 2364-8228
URL https://appliednetsci.springeropen.com

Indexings

scopus ncbi doaj

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (14)

2017
Predicting stock market movements using network science: an information theoretic approach.
Kim, Minjun;Sayama, Hiroki;
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 35
391 views DOI Abstract
2017
Dynamic correlation network analysis of financial asset returns with network clustering.
Isogai, Takashi;
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 8
350 views DOI Abstract
2019
Network cartography of university students’ knowledge landscapes about the history of science: landmarks and thematic communities
Lommi, H.
Vol. 4 , pp. 0-0
335 views DOI
2020
Centrality and shortest path length measures for the functional analysis of urban drainage networks
Reyes-Silva, J.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
308 views DOI
2020
Correction to: Mobile phone data reveals the importance of pre-disaster inter-city social ties for recovery after Hurricane Maria (Applied Network Science, (2019), 4, 1, (98), 10.1007/s41109-019-0221-5)
Yabe, T.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
290 views DOI
2019
The bow tie structure of the Bitcoin users graph
Maesa, Damiano Di Francesco;Marino, Andrea;Ricci, Laura;
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 1-22
278 views Abstract
2020
On modeling blockchain-enabled economic networks as stochastic dynamical systems
Zhang, Z.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
253 views DOI
2020
Do you trade with your friends or become friends with your trading partners? A case study in the Ğ1 cryptocurrency
Gensollen, N.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
235 views DOI
2020
Correction to: The weakness of weak ties for novel information diffusion (Applied Network Science, (2017), 2, 1, (14), 10.1007/s41109-017-0034-3)
Larson, J.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
225 views DOI
2020
Using correlated stochastic differential equations to forecast cryptocurrency rates and social media activities
Dipple, S.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
214 views DOI
2020
Analyzing hack subnetworks in the bitcoin transaction graph
Goldsmith, D.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
15 views DOI
2020
Using correlated stochastic differential equations to forecast cryptocurrency rates and social media activities
Dipple, S.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
214 views DOI
2020
Do you trade with your friends or become friends with your trading partners? A case study in the Ğ1 cryptocurrency
Gensollen, N.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
235 views DOI
2020
GraphSIF: analyzing flow of payments in a Business-to-Business network to detect supplier impersonation
Canillas, R.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
110 views DOI
2020
Security through block vault in a blockchain enabled federated cloud framework
Malomo, O.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
131 views DOI
2020
On modeling blockchain-enabled economic networks as stochastic dynamical systems
Zhang, Z.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
253 views DOI
2020
Correction to: Mobile phone data reveals the importance of pre-disaster inter-city social ties for recovery after Hurricane Maria (Applied Network Science, (2019), 4, 1, (98), 10.1007/s41109-019-0221-5)
Yabe, T.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
290 views DOI
2020
Correction to: The weakness of weak ties for novel information diffusion (Applied Network Science, (2017), 2, 1, (14), 10.1007/s41109-017-0034-3)
Larson, J.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
225 views DOI
2020
The nested structure of urban business clusters
Cottineau, C.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
167 views DOI
2020
Centrality and shortest path length measures for the functional analysis of urban drainage networks
Reyes-Silva, J.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
308 views DOI
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.