applied network science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4317 / 33,973
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

applied network science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj
Short Name appl netw sci
Abbreviated Name applied network science
ISSN 2364-8228
Aim and Scope
URL https://appliednetsci.springeropen.com
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2017
Predicting stock market movements using network science: an information theoretic approach.
Kim, Minjun;Sayama, Hiroki;
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 35
376 views DOI Abstract
2017
Dynamic correlation network analysis of financial asset returns with network clustering.
Isogai, Takashi;
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 8
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Network cartography of university students’ knowledge landscapes about the history of science: landmarks and thematic communities
Lommi, H.
Vol. 4 , pp. 0-0
323 views DOI
2020
Centrality and shortest path length measures for the functional analysis of urban drainage networks
Reyes-Silva, J.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
298 views DOI
2020
Correction to: Mobile phone data reveals the importance of pre-disaster inter-city social ties for recovery after Hurricane Maria (Applied Network Science, (2019), 4, 1, (98), 10.1007/s41109-019-0221-5)
Yabe, T.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
285 views DOI
2019
The bow tie structure of the Bitcoin users graph
Maesa, Damiano Di Francesco;Marino, Andrea;Ricci, Laura;
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 1-22
267 views Abstract
2020
On modeling blockchain-enabled economic networks as stochastic dynamical systems
Zhang, Z.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
244 views DOI
2020
Do you trade with your friends or become friends with your trading partners? A case study in the Ğ1 cryptocurrency
Gensollen, N.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
225 views DOI
2020
Correction to: The weakness of weak ties for novel information diffusion (Applied Network Science, (2017), 2, 1, (14), 10.1007/s41109-017-0034-3)
Larson, J.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
220 views DOI
2020
Using correlated stochastic differential equations to forecast cryptocurrency rates and social media activities
Dipple, S.
Vol. 5 , pp. 0-0
202 views DOI
View All 14 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.