artificial intelligence in medicine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1384 / 33,972
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

artificial intelligence in medicine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name artif intell med
Abbreviated Name artif intell med
ISSN 1873-2860
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/artificial-intelligence-in-medicine
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2019
Machine learning and big data: Implications for disease modeling and therapeutic discovery in psychiatry.
Tai, Andy M Y;Albuquerque, Alcides;Carmona, Nicole E;Subramanieapillai, Mehala;Cha, Danielle S;Sheko, Margarita;Lee, Yena;Mansur, Rodrigo;McIntyre, Roger S;
Vol. 99 , pp. 101704
487 views DOI Abstract
2019
Accurate prediction of potential druggable proteins based on genetic algorithm and Bagging-SVM ensemble classifier.
Lin, Jianying;Chen, Hui;Li, Shan;Liu, Yushuang;Li, Xuan;Yu, Bin;
Vol. 98 , pp. 35-47
385 views DOI Abstract
2019
The virtual doctor: An interactive clinical-decision-support system based on deep learning for non-invasive prediction of diabetes.
Spänig, Sebastian;Emberger-Klein, Agnes;Sowa, Jan-Peter;Canbay, Ali;Menrad, Klaus;Heider, Dominik;
Vol. 100 , pp. 101706
385 views DOI Abstract
2020
Electroencephalogram based communication system for locked in state person using mentally spelled tasks with optimized network model.
Xiaoxiao, Xu;Bin, Luo;Ramkumar, S;Saravanan, S;Balaji, M Sundar Prakash;Dhanasekaran, S;Thimmiaraja, J;
Vol. 102 , pp. 101766
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
Depression recognition using machine learning methods with different feature generation strategies.
Li, Xiaowei;Zhang, Xin;Zhu, Jing;Mao, Wandeng;Sun, Shuting;Wang, Zihan;Xia, Chen;Hu, Bin;
Vol. 99 , pp. 101696
359 views DOI Abstract
2019
3D-CNN based discrimination of schizophrenia using resting-state fMRI.
Qureshi, Muhammad Naveed Iqbal;Oh, Jooyoung;Lee, Boreom;
Vol. 98 , pp. 10-17
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
Personalized oncology with artificial intelligence: The case of temozolomide.
Houy, Nicolas;Le Grand, François;
Vol. 99 , pp. 101693
352 views DOI Abstract
2012
Analysis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk factors with Bayesian networks.
Aussem, Alex;de Morais, Sérgio Rodrigues;Corbex, Marilys;
Vol. 54 , No. 1 , pp. 53-62
350 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prediction of progression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis using CT scans at baseline: A quantum particle swarm optimization - Random forest approach.
Shi, Yu;Wong, Weng Kee;Goldin, Jonathan G;Brown, Matthew S;Kim, Grace Hyun J;
Vol. 100 , pp. 101709
336 views DOI Abstract
2020
Comprenhensive analysis of rule formalisms to represent clinical guidelines: Selection criteria and case study on antibiotic clinical guidelines.
Iglesias, Natalia;Juarez, Jose M;Campos, Manuel;
, pp. 101741
331 views DOI Abstract
View All 20 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.