journal of public health management and practice : jphmp | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3063 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

journal of public health management and practice : jphmp

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name j public health manag pract
Abbreviated Name j public health manag pract
ISSN 1550-5022
Aim and Scope
URL https://journals.lww.com/jphmp/pages/default.aspx
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2020
A Multilevel Workforce Study on Drivers of Turnover and Training Needs in State Health Departments: Do Leadership and Staff Agree?
Leider, Jonathon P;Coronado, Fátima;Bogaert, Kyle;Sellers, Katie;
447 views DOI Abstract
Training Community Health Workers to Enhance Disaster Resilience.
Nicholls, Keith;Picou, Steven J;McCord, Selena C;
Vol. 23 Suppl 6 Suppl, Gulf Region Health Outreach Program , pp. S78-S84
422 views DOI Abstract
Public Health Informatics in Local and State Health Agencies: An Update From the Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey.
McFarlane, Timothy D;Dixon, Brian E;Grannis, Shaun J;Gibson, P Joseph;
Vol. 25 Suppl 2, Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey 2017 , pp. S67-S77
390 views DOI Abstract
Factors Associated With Childhood Vaccination Adherence in Kindergartens of the Houston Independent School District.
Rajan, Suja S;Roy, Debanshu;Delgado, Rigoberto;
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 131-138
386 views DOI Abstract
Weaving latino cultural concepts into Preparedness Core Competency training.
Riley-Jacome, Mary;Parker, Blanca Angelica Gonzalez;Waltz, Edward C;
Vol. 20 Suppl 5 , pp. S89-100
376 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of Local Boards of Health on Local Health Department Accreditation, Community Health Assessment, Community Health Improvement Planning, and Strategic Planning
Shah, G.
Vol. 25 , pp. 423-430
363 views DOI
A Case Study of the Philadelphia Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Policymaking Process: Implications for Policy Development and Advocacy.
Purtle, Jonathan;Langellier, Brent;Lê-Scherban, Félice;
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 4-8
355 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Comparative Analysis of Telephone and In-Person Survey Administration for Public Health Surveillance in Rural American Indian Communities
English, K.
Vol. 25 , Tribal Epidemiology Centers: Advancing Public Health in Indian Country for Over 20 Years , pp. S70-S76
346 views DOI
Evidence-based communications strategies: NWPERLC response to training on effectively reaching limited English-speaking (LEP) populations in emergencies.
DʼAmbrosio, Luann;Huang, Claire E;Sheng Kwan-Gett, Tao;
Vol. 20 Suppl 5 , pp. S101-6
336 views DOI Abstract
The Public Health Community Platform, Electronic Case Reporting, and the Digital Bridge.
Cooney, Mary Ann;Iademarco, Michael F;Huang, Monica;MacKenzie, William R;Davidson, Arthur J;
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. 185-189
309 views DOI Abstract
View All 18 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.