journal of the american ceramic society | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2247 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

journal of the american ceramic society

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name journal of the american ceramic society
Abbreviated Name journal of the american ceramic society
ISSN 0002-7820
Aim and Scope
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1551-2916
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (9 total)

2019
Field cycling-induced evolution of functional properties in bismuth samarium ferrite ceramics
Wang, L.
Vol. 102 , pp. 4670-4677
268 views DOI
2019
Mechanical properties of illite‐based ceramics with controlled porosity studied by modern in situ techniques
Michal Knapek,Jakub Kušnír,Tomáš Húlan,P. Minárik,Štefan Csáki,František Lukáč,Patrik Dobron,František Chmelík;Michal Knapek;Jakub Kušnír;Tomáš Húlan;P. Minárik;Štefan Csáki;František Lukáč;Patrik Dobron;František Chmelík;
Vol. 103 , No. 4 , pp. 2780-2790
252 views DOI
2010
The predictive power of electronic polarizability for tailoring the refractivity of high-index glasses: Optical basicity versus the single oscillator model
McCloy, J.
Vol. 93 , pp. 1650-1662
241 views DOI
2012
Ceramic Dusting Corrosion of Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia in Ultra High Temperature Reverse-Flow Pyrolysis Reactors
Changmin Chun,Sanket Desai,Frank Hershkowitz,Trikur A. Ramanarayanan;Changmin Chun;Sanket Desai;Frank Hershkowitz;Trikur A. Ramanarayanan;
Vol. 95 , No. 12 , pp. 3962-3970
236 views DOI Abstract
2019
On the synchronicity of flash sintering and phase transformation
Yoon, B.
Vol. 102 , pp. 3110-3116
234 views DOI
2019
Stereolithography-based additive manufacturing of gray-colored SiC ceramic green body
Ding, G.
Vol. 102 , pp. 7198-7209
230 views DOI
2018
The tape casting process for manufacturing low-temperature co-fired ceramic green sheets: A review
Ren, L.
Vol. 101 , pp. 3874-3889
177 views DOI
2020
Effect of tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) on melting gel behavior
Klein, L.C.
Vol. 103 , pp. 4140-4149
103 views DOI
2020
Degradation of a SiC-SiC composite in water vapor environments
Zok, F.
Vol. 103 , pp. 1927-1941
62 views DOI
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.