expert opinion on drug safety | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1353 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

expert opinion on drug safety

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name expert opinion on drug safety
Abbreviated Name expert opin drug saf
ISSN 1744-764X
Aim and Scope
URL http://informahealthcare.com/journal/eds
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (7 total)

2009
Inhaled therapeutics for prevention and treatment of pneumonia
Safdar A;Shelburne SA;Evans SE;Dickey BF;;
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. -
360 views Abstract
2019
Factors that facilitate reporting of adverse drug reactions by pharmacists in Saudi Arabia.
Aldryhim, Ahmed Y;Alomair, Abdulrahman;Alqhtani, Meshari;Mahmoud, Mansour A;Alshammari, Thamir M;Pont, Lisa G;Kamal, Khalid M;Aljadhey, Hisham;Mekonnen, Alemayehu B;Alwhaibi, Monira;Balkhi, Bander;Alhawassi, Tariq M;
Vol. 18 , No. 8 , pp. 745-752
353 views DOI Abstract
2018
A characterization and disproportionality analysis of medication error related adverse events reported to the FAERS database.
Carnovale, Carla;Mazhar, Faizan;Pozzi, Marco;Gentili, Marta;Clementi, Emilio;Radice, Sonia;
Vol. 17 , No. 12 , pp. 1161-1169
338 views DOI Abstract
2017
A review of existing and emerging digital technologies to combat the global trade in fake medicines.
Mackey, Tim K;Nayyar, Gaurvika;
Vol. 16 , No. 5 , pp. 587-602
326 views DOI Abstract
2019
Safety profile and clinical course of patients with insomnia administered suvorexant by initial treatment status in a post-marketing survey.
Sano, Hideki;Asai, Yuko;Miyazaki, Makoto;Iwakura, Mika;Maeda, Yoshikazu;Hara, Mitsuyoshi;
, pp. 1-10
281 views DOI Abstract
2005
What to do with TNF failures
Keystone, Edward C;Kavanaugh, Arthur;
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 149-155
194 views DOI
2009
Inhaled therapeutics for prevention and treatment of pneumonia
Amar Safdar, Samuel A. Shelburne, Scott E. Evans, Burton F. Dickey;Amar Safdar;Samuel A. Shelburne;Scott E. Evans;Burton F. Dickey;
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 435-
160 views DOI Abstract
43
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.