Indexed in Journament

journal of multidisciplinary healthcare

ISSN 1178-2390· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #8,152 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
13 Articles
Scores higher than 72.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j multidiscip healthc
Abbreviated Name j multidiscip healthc
ISSN 1178-2390
URL https://www.dovepress.com/journal-of-multidisciplinary-healthcare-journal

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.2
Accessibility 35.0 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity 38.9 28.2
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 16.4 11.5
Content Distribution 74.7 88.5
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (13)

2015
Implications of observing and writing field notes through different lenses.
Hellesø, Ragnhild;Melby, Line;Hauge, Solveig;
Vol. 8 , pp. 189-97
650 views DOI Abstract
2019
The drama in the hybrid OR: video observations of work processes and staff collaboration during endovascular aortic repair.
Bazzi, May;Lundgren, Solveig M;Hellström, Mikael;Fridh, Isabell;Ahlberg, Karin;Bergbom, Ingegerd;
Vol. 12 , pp. 453-464
453 views DOI Abstract
2019
Leadership in interprofessional collaboration in health care.
Folkman, Anne Katrine;Tveit, Bodil;Sverdrup, Sidsel;
Vol. 12 , pp. 97-107
449 views DOI Abstract
2015
Implications of observing and writing field notes through different lenses
R, Hellesø;L, Melby;S, Hauge;
Vol. 2015 , No. default , pp. 189-197
436 views Abstract
2019
Use and preferences of information and communication technologies in patients with hypertension: a cross-sectional study in Ecuador.
Chérrez-Ojeda, Ivan;Vanegas, Emanuel;Felix, Miguel;Mata, Valeria L;Gavilanes, Antonio Wd;Chedraui, Peter;
Vol. 12 , pp. 583-590
430 views DOI Abstract
2020
Job satisfaction among nurses in Iran: does gender matter?
Akbari, Morteza;Bagheri, Afsaneh;Fathollahi, Aliakbari;Darvish, Majid;
Vol. 13 , pp. 71-78
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
Barriers and enablers to the implementation of perioperative hypothermia prevention practices from the perspectives of the multidisciplinary team: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.
Munday, Judy;Delaforce, Alana;Forbes, Gillian;Keogh, Samantha;
Vol. 12 , pp. 395-417
386 views DOI Abstract
2017
Future challenges for occupational health services can be prevented by proactive collaboration with the companies using the services: a participatory and reflection project.
Lydell, Marie;Hildingh, Cathrine;Söderbom, Arne;Ziegert, Kristina;
Vol. 10 , pp. 217-225
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Self-medication practices among Vietnamese residents in highland provinces.
Ha, Thuy Van;Nguyen, An Mai Thi;Nguyen, Ha Song Thi;
Vol. 12 , pp. 493-502
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
From theory to practice: a conceptual framework to facilitate implementation of evidence in stroke rehabilitation for local context in Saudi Arabia.
Alatawi, Salem F;
Vol. 12 , pp. 515-525
362 views DOI Abstract
2020
Screening for Bone Mineral Density and Assessment Knowledge Level of Low Peak Bone Risk Factors and Preventive Practices Among Kuwaiti Future Mothers.
Al-Ayyadhi, Najla; Refaat, Laila Abd ElRaheem; Ibrahim, Mahasen Mohamed; Abd ElGalil, Heba Mohamed
Vol. 13 , pp. 1983-1991
89 views DOI Abstract
2020
Job satisfaction among nurses in Iran: does gender matter?
Akbari, Morteza;Bagheri, Afsaneh;Fathollahi, Aliakbari;Darvish, Majid;
Vol. 13 , pp. 71-78
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
Barriers and enablers to the implementation of perioperative hypothermia prevention practices from the perspectives of the multidisciplinary team: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.
Munday, Judy;Delaforce, Alana;Forbes, Gillian;Keogh, Samantha;
Vol. 12 , pp. 395-417
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact on patient satisfaction and importance of medical intake and office staff in a multidisciplinary, one-stop shop transgender program in Indianapolis, Indiana
Nowaskie, D.
Vol. 12 , pp. 665-673
282 views DOI
2019
Leadership in interprofessional collaboration in health care.
Folkman, Anne Katrine;Tveit, Bodil;Sverdrup, Sidsel;
Vol. 12 , pp. 97-107
449 views DOI Abstract
2019
The drama in the hybrid OR: video observations of work processes and staff collaboration during endovascular aortic repair.
Bazzi, May;Lundgren, Solveig M;Hellström, Mikael;Fridh, Isabell;Ahlberg, Karin;Bergbom, Ingegerd;
Vol. 12 , pp. 453-464
453 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use and preferences of information and communication technologies in patients with hypertension: a cross-sectional study in Ecuador.
Chérrez-Ojeda, Ivan;Vanegas, Emanuel;Felix, Miguel;Mata, Valeria L;Gavilanes, Antonio Wd;Chedraui, Peter;
Vol. 12 , pp. 583-590
430 views DOI Abstract
2019
From theory to practice: a conceptual framework to facilitate implementation of evidence in stroke rehabilitation for local context in Saudi Arabia.
Alatawi, Salem F;
Vol. 12 , pp. 515-525
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
Self-medication practices among Vietnamese residents in highland provinces.
Ha, Thuy Van;Nguyen, An Mai Thi;Nguyen, Ha Song Thi;
Vol. 12 , pp. 493-502
379 views DOI Abstract
2017
Future challenges for occupational health services can be prevented by proactive collaboration with the companies using the services: a participatory and reflection project.
Lydell, Marie;Hildingh, Cathrine;Söderbom, Arne;Ziegert, Kristina;
Vol. 10 , pp. 217-225
384 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #8,152 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

38.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

16.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

74.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.