journal of multidisciplinary healthcare | Journament

Journal Ranking

#545 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

journal of multidisciplinary healthcare

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj
Short Name j multidiscip healthc
Abbreviated Name j multidiscip healthc
ISSN 1178-2390
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.dovepress.com/journal-of-multidisciplinary-healthcare-journal
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2015
Implications of observing and writing field notes through different lenses.
Hellesø, Ragnhild;Melby, Line;Hauge, Solveig;
Vol. 8 , pp. 189-97
606 views DOI Abstract
2019
The drama in the hybrid OR: video observations of work processes and staff collaboration during endovascular aortic repair.
Bazzi, May;Lundgren, Solveig M;Hellström, Mikael;Fridh, Isabell;Ahlberg, Karin;Bergbom, Ingegerd;
Vol. 12 , pp. 453-464
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
Leadership in interprofessional collaboration in health care.
Folkman, Anne Katrine;Tveit, Bodil;Sverdrup, Sidsel;
Vol. 12 , pp. 97-107
416 views DOI Abstract
2015
Implications of observing and writing field notes through different lenses
R, Hellesø;L, Melby;S, Hauge;
Vol. 2015 , No. default , pp. 189-197
391 views Abstract
2019
Use and preferences of information and communication technologies in patients with hypertension: a cross-sectional study in Ecuador.
Chérrez-Ojeda, Ivan;Vanegas, Emanuel;Felix, Miguel;Mata, Valeria L;Gavilanes, Antonio Wd;Chedraui, Peter;
Vol. 12 , pp. 583-590
389 views DOI Abstract
2017
Future challenges for occupational health services can be prevented by proactive collaboration with the companies using the services: a participatory and reflection project.
Lydell, Marie;Hildingh, Cathrine;Söderbom, Arne;Ziegert, Kristina;
Vol. 10 , pp. 217-225
360 views DOI Abstract
2020
Job satisfaction among nurses in Iran: does gender matter?
Akbari, Morteza;Bagheri, Afsaneh;Fathollahi, Aliakbari;Darvish, Majid;
Vol. 13 , pp. 71-78
352 views DOI Abstract
2019
Self-medication practices among Vietnamese residents in highland provinces.
Ha, Thuy Van;Nguyen, An Mai Thi;Nguyen, Ha Song Thi;
Vol. 12 , pp. 493-502
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
Barriers and enablers to the implementation of perioperative hypothermia prevention practices from the perspectives of the multidisciplinary team: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.
Munday, Judy;Delaforce, Alana;Forbes, Gillian;Keogh, Samantha;
Vol. 12 , pp. 395-417
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
From theory to practice: a conceptual framework to facilitate implementation of evidence in stroke rehabilitation for local context in Saudi Arabia.
Alatawi, Salem F;
Vol. 12 , pp. 515-525
329 views DOI Abstract
View All 13 Articles
44
Overall
Below Average
31
50
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

39.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.