Indexed in Journament

clinical pharmacology and therapeutics

ISSN 1532-6535· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
43.6 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #809 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
11 Articles
Scores higher than 97.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name clin pharmacol ther
Abbreviated Name clin pharmacol ther
ISSN 1532-6535
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1532-6535

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 74.1 26.4
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 10.0 4.4
Content Distribution 88.2 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (11)

2020
Challenges in Alzheimer Disease Drug Discovery and Development: The Role of Modeling, Simulation and Open Data.
Conrado, Daniela J;Duvvuri, Sridhar;Geerts, Hugo;Burton, Jackson;Biesdorf, Carla;Ahamadi, Malidi;Macha, Sreeraj;Hather, Gregory;Morales, Juan Francisco;Podichetty, Jagdeep;Nicholas, Timothy;Stephenson, Diane;Trame, Mirjam;Romero, Klaus;Corrigan, Brian;, ;
478 views DOI Abstract
2020
Development of a System for Post-marketing Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Studies using Real-World Data from Electronic Health Records.
Choi, Leena;Beck, Cole;McNeer, Elizabeth;Weeks, Hannah L;Williams, Michael L;James, Nathan T;Niu, Xinnan;Abou-Khalil, Bassel W;Birdwell, Kelly A;Roden, Dan M;Stein, C Michael;Bejan, Cosmin A;Denny, Joshua C;Van Driest, Sara L;
454 views DOI Abstract
2020
Clinical Pharmacology Perspectives on the Antiviral Activity of Azithromycin and Use in COVID-19.
Damle, Bharat;Vourvahis, Manoli;Wang, Erjian;Leaney, Joanne;Corrigan, Brian;
438 views DOI Abstract
2002
The effects of the human MDR1 genotype on the expression of duodenal P-glycoprotein and disposition of the probe drug talinolol.
Siegmund, Werner;Ludwig, Karen;Giessmann, Thomas;Dazert, Peter;Schroeder, Eike;Sperker, Bernhard;Warzok, Rolf;Kroemer, Heyo K;Cascorbi, Ingolf;
Vol. 72 , No. 5 , pp. 572-83
436 views Abstract
2020
MID3: Mission Impossible or Model-Informed Drug Discovery and Development? Point-Counterpoint Discussions on Key Challenges.
Krishnaswami, Sriram;Austin, Daren;Della Pasqua, Oscar;Gastonguay, Marc R;Gobburu, Jogarao;van der Graaf, Piet H;Ouellet, Daniele;Tannenbaum, Stacey;Visser, Sandra A G;
425 views DOI Abstract
2019
Model-informed dose selection for Xentuzumab, a dual insulin-like growth factor-I/II -neutralizing antibody.
Parra-Guillen, Zinnia P;Schmid, Ulrike;Janda, Alvaro;Freiwald, Matthias;Troconiz, Iñaki F;
406 views DOI Abstract
2019
Can Insights From Placebo and Nocebo Mechanism Studies Help Improve Randomized Controlled Trials?
Vase, Lene;
357 views DOI
2002
Effect of levothyroxine administration on intestinal P-glycoprotein expression: consequences for drug disposition.
Siegmund, Werner;Altmannsberger, Stephan;Paneitz, Andrea;Hecker, Ute;Zschiesche, Michael;Franke, Gerd;Meng, Wieland;Warzok, Rolf;Schroeder, Eike;Sperker, Bernhard;Terhaag, Bernd;Cascorbi, Ingolf;Kroemer, Heyo K;
Vol. 72 , No. 3 , pp. 256-64
344 views Abstract
2020
Target adverse event profiles for predictive safety in the post-market setting.
Schotland, Peter;Racz, Rebecca;Jackson, David B;Soldatos, Theodoros G;Levin, Robert;Strauss, David;Burkhart, Keith;
313 views DOI Abstract
2020
Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Predict the Clinical Efficacy of the Coadministration of Lopinavir and Ritonavir against SARS-CoV-2
Thakur A;Tan SPF;Chan JCY;;
, pp. -
308 views Abstract
2020
Target adverse event profiles for predictive safety in the post-market setting.
Schotland, Peter;Racz, Rebecca;Jackson, David B;Soldatos, Theodoros G;Levin, Robert;Strauss, David;Burkhart, Keith;
313 views DOI Abstract
2020
Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Predict the Clinical Efficacy of the Coadministration of Lopinavir and Ritonavir against SARS-CoV-2
Thakur A;Tan SPF;Chan JCY;;
, pp. -
308 views Abstract
2020
Clinical Pharmacology Perspectives on the Antiviral Activity of Azithromycin and Use in COVID-19.
Damle, Bharat;Vourvahis, Manoli;Wang, Erjian;Leaney, Joanne;Corrigan, Brian;
438 views DOI Abstract
2020
Development of a System for Post-marketing Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Studies using Real-World Data from Electronic Health Records.
Choi, Leena;Beck, Cole;McNeer, Elizabeth;Weeks, Hannah L;Williams, Michael L;James, Nathan T;Niu, Xinnan;Abou-Khalil, Bassel W;Birdwell, Kelly A;Roden, Dan M;Stein, C Michael;Bejan, Cosmin A;Denny, Joshua C;Van Driest, Sara L;
454 views DOI Abstract
2020
Challenges in Alzheimer Disease Drug Discovery and Development: The Role of Modeling, Simulation and Open Data.
Conrado, Daniela J;Duvvuri, Sridhar;Geerts, Hugo;Burton, Jackson;Biesdorf, Carla;Ahamadi, Malidi;Macha, Sreeraj;Hather, Gregory;Morales, Juan Francisco;Podichetty, Jagdeep;Nicholas, Timothy;Stephenson, Diane;Trame, Mirjam;Romero, Klaus;Corrigan, Brian;, ;
478 views DOI Abstract
2020
MID3: Mission Impossible or Model-Informed Drug Discovery and Development? Point-Counterpoint Discussions on Key Challenges.
Krishnaswami, Sriram;Austin, Daren;Della Pasqua, Oscar;Gastonguay, Marc R;Gobburu, Jogarao;van der Graaf, Piet H;Ouellet, Daniele;Tannenbaum, Stacey;Visser, Sandra A G;
425 views DOI Abstract
2019
Model-informed dose selection for Xentuzumab, a dual insulin-like growth factor-I/II -neutralizing antibody.
Parra-Guillen, Zinnia P;Schmid, Ulrike;Janda, Alvaro;Freiwald, Matthias;Troconiz, Iñaki F;
406 views DOI Abstract
2019
Can Insights From Placebo and Nocebo Mechanism Studies Help Improve Randomized Controlled Trials?
Vase, Lene;
357 views DOI
2002
Effect of levothyroxine administration on intestinal P-glycoprotein expression: consequences for drug disposition.
Siegmund, Werner;Altmannsberger, Stephan;Paneitz, Andrea;Hecker, Ute;Zschiesche, Michael;Franke, Gerd;Meng, Wieland;Warzok, Rolf;Schroeder, Eike;Sperker, Bernhard;Terhaag, Bernd;Cascorbi, Ingolf;Kroemer, Heyo K;
Vol. 72 , No. 3 , pp. 256-64
344 views Abstract
2002
The effects of the human MDR1 genotype on the expression of duodenal P-glycoprotein and disposition of the probe drug talinolol.
Siegmund, Werner;Ludwig, Karen;Giessmann, Thomas;Dazert, Peter;Schroeder, Eike;Sperker, Bernhard;Warzok, Rolf;Kroemer, Heyo K;Cascorbi, Ingolf;
Vol. 72 , No. 5 , pp. 572-83
436 views Abstract
Journament Score
43.6/100 · Below Average
Ranked #809 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

74.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

88.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.