Indexed in Journament

Journal of safety research

ISSN 1879-1247· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #18,309 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
46 Articles
Scores higher than 37.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Kisa Ad J Safety Res
Kisaltilmis Ad journal of safety research
ISSN 1879-1247
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-safety-research

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 38.9 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 5.7 13.4
Content Distribution 59.7 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (46)

2019
How do organizational practices relate to perceived system safety effectiveness? Perceptions of safety climate and co-worker commitment to safety as workplace safety signals
Stackhouse M.
Vol. 70 , pp. 59-69
460 views DOI
2010
(mis)managing labour markets? the decline of the contemporary global labour market for british seafarers.
;S. Ruggunan
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 15-26
447 views DOI Abstract
2019
Drivers' visual scanning behavior at signalized and unsignalized intersections: A naturalistic driving study in China.
Li, Guofa;Wang, Ying;Zhu, Fangping;Sui, Xiaoxuan;Wang, Ning;Qu, Xingda;Green, Paul;
Vol. 71 , pp. 219-229
426 views DOI Abstract
2017
export experience and key success factors in cross-border trade: evidence from southern africa
;Shepherd Dhliwayo
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e9
423 views DOI Abstract
2019
To reduce or to cease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative studies on self-regulation of driving.
Ang, Boon Hong;Oxley, Jennifer Anne;Chen, Won Sun;Yap, Khai Khun;Song, Keang Peng;Lee, Shaun Wen Huey;
Vol. 70 , pp. 243-251
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
Multi-level safety climate associations with safety behaviors in the fire service.
Smith, Todd D;DeJoy, David M;Dyal, Mari-Amanda;Pu, Yongjia;Dickinson, Stephanie;
Vol. 69 , pp. 53-60
406 views DOI Abstract
2019
Analysis of the impact of health and safety coordinator on construction site accidents: The case of Spain.
Lozano-Díez, Rafael Vicente;López-Zaldívar, Oscar;Herrero Del Cura, Sofía;Verdú-Vázquez, Amparo;
Vol. 68 , pp. 149-156
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
Individual, business-related, and work environment factors associated with driving tired among taxi drivers in two metropolitan U.S. cities
Menéndez, C.
Vol. 70 , pp. 71-77
382 views DOI
2019
Communication in the workplace: Defining the conversations of supervisors
Newnam S.
Vol. 70 , pp. 19-23
367 views DOI
2019
Integrating safety, health and environmental management systems: A conceptual framework for achieving lean enterprise outcomes.
Kruse, Travis;Veltri, Anthony;Branscum, Adam;
Vol. 71 , pp. 259-271
349 views DOI Abstract
2020
Tracing the physiological response and behavioral performance of drivers at different levels of mental workload using driving simulators
Zokaei, M.
Vol. 72 , pp. 213-223
204 views DOI
2020
What's in a name? Drivers’ perceptions of the use of five SAE Level 2 driving automation systems
Teoh, E.
Vol. 72 , pp. 145-151
172 views DOI
2019
The effects of persistent audible seat belt reminders and a speed-limiting interlock on the seat belt use of drivers who do not always use a seat belt.
Kidd, David G;Singer, Jeremiah;
Vol. 71 , pp. 13-24
199 views DOI Abstract
2019
Leadership skills for strengthening jobsite safety climate.
Goldenhar, Linda M;Schwatka, Natalie;Johnson, Stefanie K;
Vol. 70 , pp. 263-271
337 views DOI Abstract
2019
Multi-level safety climate associations with safety behaviors in the fire service.
Smith, Todd D;DeJoy, David M;Dyal, Mari-Amanda;Pu, Yongjia;Dickinson, Stephanie;
Vol. 69 , pp. 53-60
406 views DOI Abstract
2019
Integrating safety, health and environmental management systems: A conceptual framework for achieving lean enterprise outcomes.
Kruse, Travis;Veltri, Anthony;Branscum, Adam;
Vol. 71 , pp. 259-271
349 views DOI Abstract
2019
Drivers' visual scanning behavior at signalized and unsignalized intersections: A naturalistic driving study in China.
Li, Guofa;Wang, Ying;Zhu, Fangping;Sui, Xiaoxuan;Wang, Ning;Qu, Xingda;Green, Paul;
Vol. 71 , pp. 219-229
426 views DOI Abstract
2019
To reduce or to cease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative studies on self-regulation of driving.
Ang, Boon Hong;Oxley, Jennifer Anne;Chen, Won Sun;Yap, Khai Khun;Song, Keang Peng;Lee, Shaun Wen Huey;
Vol. 70 , pp. 243-251
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
The impact of macroeconomic and industrial fluctuation on fatalities of construction workers in China
Liang, K.
Vol. 70 , pp. 149-158
260 views DOI
2019
Road traffic accident severity analysis: A census-based study in China
Wang, D.
Vol. 70 , pp. 135-147
305 views DOI
Journament Score
33.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #18,309 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

33.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

38.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

59.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.