Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4568 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim
Short Name An Acad Bras Cienc
Abbreviated Name anais da academia brasileira de ciencias
ISSN 1678-2690
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0001-3765&lng=en&nrm=iso
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2018
Silver and gold nanoparticles from tannic acid: Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of antileishmanial and cytotoxic activities
Lopes, L.
Vol. 90 , pp. 2679-2689
673 views DOI Abstract
0000
Land use drives change in amazonian tree species
VIEIRA, IMA CÉLIA G.;
Vol. 91 , No. suppl 3 , pp. -
399 views Abstract
2019
Natural Products: Perspectives and Challenges for use of Brazilian Plant Species in the Bioeconomy.
Valli, Marilia;Bolzani, Vanderlan S;
Vol. 91 , No. suppl 3 , pp. e20190208
385 views DOI Abstract
Silver and gold nanoparticles from tannic acid: synthesis, characterization and evaluation of antileishmanial and cytotoxic activities.
Lopes, Lourdes C S;Brito, Lucas M;Bezerra, Thayllan T;Gomes, Kleyton N;Carvalho, Fernando A DE A;Chaves, Mariana Helena;Cantanhêde, Welter;
Vol. 90 , No. 3 , pp. 2679-2689
375 views DOI Abstract
2018
Synthesis and Cytotoxic Evaluation of 1H-1,2,3-Triazol-1-ylmethyl-2,3-dihydronaphtho[1,2-b]furan-4,5-diones
CHIPOLINE, INGRID C.;ALVES, EVELYNE;BRANCO, PAOLA;COSTA-LOTUFO, LETICIA V.;FERREIRA, VITOR F.;SILVA, FERNANDO C. DA;
, pp. -
370 views Abstract
Production of crispy bread snacks containing chicken meat and chicken meat powder.
Cakmak, Hulya;Altinel, Burak;Kumcuoglu, Seher;Kisla, Duygu;Tavman, Sebnem;
Vol. 88 , No. 4 , pp. 2387-2399
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
An overview of the 2017 report of the French academy of Sciences on biodiversity.
Lavorel, Sandra;Lebreton, Jean-Dominique;Maho, Yvon LE;
Vol. 91 , No. suppl 3 , pp. e20190215
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Candesartan inhibits inflammation through an angiotensin II type 1 receptor independent way in human embryonic kidney epithelial cells
Yu, Y.
Vol. 91 , pp. e20180699
328 views DOI
2019
Life History Parameters of Genypterus brasiliensis (Teleostei: Ophidiidae), an Endemic Fisheries Resource of the Southwestern Atlantic.
Tomás, Acácio R G;Eleuterio, Celso L T;Velasco, Gonzalo;
Vol. 91 , No. 3 , pp. e20170793
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
Land use drives change in amazonian tree species.
Vieira, Ima Célia G;
Vol. 91 , No. supp 3 , pp. e20190186
322 views DOI Abstract
View All 18 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.