Indexed in Journament

international journal of clinical pharmacy

ISSN 2210-7711· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.2/100
Journament Score
#5,211
Journament Rank
16
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name int j clin pharm
Abbreviated Name international journal of clinical pharmacy
ISSN 2210-7711
URL https://www.springer.com/medicine/internal/journal/11096

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

2020
Duration of opioid use and association with socioeconomic status, daily dose and formulation: a two-decade population study in Queensland, Australia.
Adewumi, Adeleke D;Maravilla, Joemer C;Alati, Rosa;Hollingworth, Samantha A;Hu, Xuelei;Loveday, Bill;Connor, Jason P;
686 views DOI Abstract
2019
Medicine taking behaviours of people with type 2 diabetes in Indonesia: a qualitative study.
Widayanti, Anna Wahyuni;Norris, Pauline;Heydon, Susan;Green, James A;
566 views DOI Abstract
2019
Clinical pharmacy practice in the care of Chronic Kidney Disease patients: a systematic review.
Al Raiisi, Fatma;Stewart, Derek;Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando;Salgado, Teresa M;Mohamed, Moustafa Fahmy;Cunningham, Scott;
Vol. 41 , No. 3 , pp. 630-666
554 views DOI Abstract
2020
Improving patient safety through a pharmacist-led medication reconciliation programme in nursing homes for the elderly in Spain.
Koprivnik, Sandra;Albiñana-Pérez, María Sandra;López-Sandomingo, Laura;Taboada-López, Roberto José;Rodríguez-Penín, Isaura;
552 views DOI Abstract
2016
Bridging the gap: improving safe prescribing from university to workplace.
Ward, Stephen;Wasson, Gemma;
Vol. 38 , No. 5 , pp. 1023-6
438 views DOI Abstract
2013
Community pharmacy practice in China: past, present and future.
Fang, Yu;Yang, Shimin;Zhou, Siting;Jiang, Minghuan;Liu, Jun;
Vol. 35 , No. 4 , pp. 520-8
408 views DOI Abstract
2019
Perceptions, preferences and acceptability of patient designed 3D printed medicine by polypharmacy patients: a pilot study.
Fastø, Mark Møller;Genina, Natalja;Kaae, Susanne;Kälvemark Sporrong, Sofia;
369 views DOI Abstract
2018
Exploring medicines management by COPD patients and their social networks after hospital discharge.
Schafheutle, Ellen Ingrid;Fegan, Tom;Ashcroft, Darren M;
Vol. 40 , No. 5 , pp. 1019-1029
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
The impact of generics and generic reference pricing on candesartan and rosuvastatin utilisation, price and expenditure in South Africa
de, Jager H.
Vol. 41 , pp. 81-87
358 views DOI
2019
Usability and sensitivity of the risk of bias assessment tool for randomized controlled trials of pharmacist interventions.
Tonin, Fernanda S;Lopes, Livia A;Rotta, Inajara;Bonetti, Aline F;Pontarolo, Roberto;Correr, Cassyano J;Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando;
Vol. 41 , No. 3 , pp. 785-792
335 views DOI Abstract
2022
Potential drug-drug interactions of immunosuppressants in kidney transplant recipients: comparison of drug interaction resources
Aysel Pehlivanlı; Rezzan Eren-Sadioglu; M. Aktar; S. Eyupoglu; S. Sengul; K. Keven; S. Erturk; B. Başgut; A. Ozçelikay
89 views DOI
2020
Duration of opioid use and association with socioeconomic status, daily dose and formulation: a two-decade population study in Queensland, Australia.
Adewumi, Adeleke D;Maravilla, Joemer C;Alati, Rosa;Hollingworth, Samantha A;Hu, Xuelei;Loveday, Bill;Connor, Jason P;
686 views DOI Abstract
2020
Combating drug shortages in China: surveillance warning and practice standardization.
Shi, Yin;Yang, Ping;Li, Xiangping;Lv, Jinfeng;Yin, Tao;Gong, Zhicheng;Sun, Shusen;Zhou, Boting;
274 views DOI Abstract
2020
Improving patient safety through a pharmacist-led medication reconciliation programme in nursing homes for the elderly in Spain.
Koprivnik, Sandra;Albiñana-Pérez, María Sandra;López-Sandomingo, Laura;Taboada-López, Roberto José;Rodríguez-Penín, Isaura;
552 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of CYP3A5 genotype on hospitalization cost for kidney transplantation.
Vannaprasaht, Suda;Limwattananon, Chulaporn;Anutrakulchai, Sirirat;Chan-On, Chitranon;
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. 88-95
313 views DOI Abstract
2019
Medicine taking behaviours of people with type 2 diabetes in Indonesia: a qualitative study.
Widayanti, Anna Wahyuni;Norris, Pauline;Heydon, Susan;Green, James A;
566 views DOI Abstract
2019
Perceptions, preferences and acceptability of patient designed 3D printed medicine by polypharmacy patients: a pilot study.
Fastø, Mark Møller;Genina, Natalja;Kaae, Susanne;Kälvemark Sporrong, Sofia;
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Stakeholder perspectives on the challenges surrounding management and supply of essential medicines.
Duong, Mai H;Moles, Rebekah J;Chaar, Betty;Chen, Timothy F;
218 views DOI Abstract
2019
Usability and sensitivity of the risk of bias assessment tool for randomized controlled trials of pharmacist interventions.
Tonin, Fernanda S;Lopes, Livia A;Rotta, Inajara;Bonetti, Aline F;Pontarolo, Roberto;Correr, Cassyano J;Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando;
Vol. 41 , No. 3 , pp. 785-792
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Clinical pharmacy practice in the care of Chronic Kidney Disease patients: a systematic review.
Al Raiisi, Fatma;Stewart, Derek;Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando;Salgado, Teresa M;Mohamed, Moustafa Fahmy;Cunningham, Scott;
Vol. 41 , No. 3 , pp. 630-666
554 views DOI Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.