Indexed in Journament

contemporary clinical trials communications

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.0 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #1,210 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
58 Articles
Scores higher than 95.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

ชื่อย่อ contemp clin trials commun
ชื่อตัวย่อ contemporary clinical trials communications
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.0
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 67.3
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.0
Content Distribution 64.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 67.3 26.1
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 10.0 4.2
Content Distribution 64.6 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (58)

2019
Design of the patient navigator to Reduce Readmissions (PArTNER) study: A pragmatic clinical effectiveness trial.
Prieto-Centurion, Valentin;Basu, Sanjib;Bracken, Nina;Calhoun, Elizabeth;Dickens, Carolyn;DiDomenico, Robert J;Gallardo, Richard;Gordeuk, Victor;Gutierrez-Kapheim, Melissa;Hsu, Lewis L;Illendula, Sai;Joo, Min;Kazmi, Uzma;Mutso, Amelia;Pickard, A Simon;Pittendrigh, Barry;Sullivan, Jamie L;Williams, Mark;Krishnan, Jerry A;
Vol. 15 , pp. 100420
678 views DOI Abstract
2017
the superficial and deep retinal capillary plexus in cases of fovea plana imaged by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography
;Georgia Kaidonis;Ruwan A. Silva;Steven R. Sanislo;Theodore Leng
Vol. 6 , No. C , pp. 41-44
516 views DOI Abstract
2017
The Vitamin D for Enhancing the Immune System in Cystic Fibrosis (DISC) trial: Rationale and design of a multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of high dose bolus administration of vitamin D3 during acute pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosis
Tangpricha, Vin;Smith, Ellen M.;Binongo, Jose;Judd, Suzanne E.;Ziegler, Thomas R.;Walker, Seth;Tirouvanziam, Rabindra;Zughaier, Susu M.;Lee, Moon Jeong;Chesdachai, Supavit;Hermes, Wendy A.;Chmiel, James F.;Gaggar, Amit;Grossmann, Ruth E.;Joseph, Patricia M.;Alvarez, Jessica A.;
Vol. 6 , No. C , pp. 39-45
516 views Abstract
2018
Long title: Protocol for evaluating a Consultation for Suffering at work in French-speaking Switzerland
Bontemps, Sophie;Barlet-Ghaleb, Catherine;Mediouni, Zakia;Besse, Christine;Bonsack, Charles;Wild, Pascal;Danuser, Brigitta;
Vol. 9 , No. C , pp. 71-76
493 views Abstract
2019
Shared decision making in IBD: A novel approach to trial consent and timing.
Schuler, Christine L;Dodds, Cassandra;Hommel, Kevin A;Ittenbach, Richard F;Denson, Lee A;Lipstein, Ellen A;
Vol. 16 , pp. 100447
487 views DOI Abstract
2018
Outpatient versus inpatient mixed meal tolerance and arginine stimulation testing yields comparable measures of variability for assessment of beta cell function.
Shankar, Sudha S;Lee, Douglas S;Raymond, Ralph H;Calle, Roberto A;Cobelli, Claudio;Ghosh, Atalanta;Robertson, R Paul;Ruetten, Hartmut;Staten, Myrlene A;Stefanovski, Darko;Vella, Adrian;Whitaker, Sanya;Fryburg, David A;, ;
Vol. 10 , pp. 94-99
483 views DOI Abstract
2017
results with the boston type i keratoprosthesis after acanthamoeba keratitis
;Albert Santos;Luzia Diegues Silva;Luciene Barbosa de Sousa;Denise de Freitas;Lauro Augusto de Oliveira
Vol. 6 , No. C , pp. 71-73
466 views DOI Abstract
2019
Protocol for evaluating a workplace intervention within the framework of consultations for suffering at work in French-speaking Switzerland
Mediouni Z.
Vol. 15 , pp. 0-0
450 views DOI
2018
visual acuity of 20/32, 13.5 years after a retinal pigment epithelium and choroid graft transplantation
;Elsbeth J.T. van Zeeburg;Kristel J.M. Maaijwee;Jan C. van Meurs
Vol. 10 , pp. 62-64
443 views Abstract
2020
Audience segmentation as a strategy for enhancing the use of research registries for recruiting patients into clinical trials.
Flood-Grady, Elizabeth;Liu, Jiawei;Paige, Samantha R;Lee, Donghee;Nelson, David R;Shenkman, Elizabeth;Hough, Deaven;Krieger, Janice L;
Vol. 17 , pp. 100510
439 views DOI Abstract
2020
Parallel but connected: Nuances of conducting behavioral and social science research alongside ethically challenging HIV remission trials
Henderson, G.E.
Vol. 19 , pp. 0-0
171 views DOI
2020
Effectiveness and safety of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria using either dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine or artesunate-amodiaquine in reducing malaria related morbidities and improving cognitive ability in school-aged children in Tanzania: A study protocol for a controlled randomised trial.
Makenga, Geofrey;Baraka, Vito;Francis, Filbert;Nakato, Swabra;Gesase, Samwel;Mtove, George;Madebe, Rashid;Kyaruzi, Edna;Minja, Daniel T R;Lusingu, John P A;Van Geertruyden, Jean-Pierre;
Vol. 17 , pp. 100546
369 views DOI Abstract
2020
A ResearchKit app to deliver paediatric electronic consent: Protocol of an observational study in adolescents with arthritis.
Lalloo, Chitra;Pham, Quynh;Cafazzo, Joseph;Stephenson, Elizabeth;Stinson, Jennifer;
Vol. 17 , pp. 100525
321 views DOI Abstract
2020
Audience segmentation as a strategy for enhancing the use of research registries for recruiting patients into clinical trials.
Flood-Grady, Elizabeth;Liu, Jiawei;Paige, Samantha R;Lee, Donghee;Nelson, David R;Shenkman, Elizabeth;Hough, Deaven;Krieger, Janice L;
Vol. 17 , pp. 100510
439 views DOI Abstract
2020
Development and application of a primer and reference assessment tool for neonatal abstinence syndrome: A phase I pilot study.
Burduli, Ekaterina;Smith, Crystal Lederhos;Tham, Phoebe;Shogan, Maureen;Johnson, Ron Kim;McPherson, Sterling M;
Vol. 17 , pp. 100494
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
Digital recruitment and enrollment in a remote nationwide trial of screening for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation: Lessons from the randomized, controlled mSToPS trial
Baca-Motes, K.
Vol. 14 , pp. 0-0
216 views DOI
2019
Biobehavioral effects of Tai Chi Qigong in men with prostate cancer: Study design of a three-arm randomized clinical trial
Kinney, A.
Vol. 16 , pp. 0-0
269 views DOI
2019
Chlamydia in adolescent/adult reproductive management trial study (CHARM): Clinical core protocol
Mark, K.
Vol. 16 , pp. 0-0
170 views DOI
2019
First-in-human phase I clinical trial of a combined immune modulatory approach using TetMYB vaccine and Anti-PD-1 antibody in patients with advanced solid cancer including colorectal or adenoid cystic carcinoma: The MYPHISMO study protocol (NCT03287427)
Pham, T.
Vol. 16 , pp. 0-0
407 views DOI
2019
A note on the determination of non-inferiority margins with application in oncology clinical trials
Yu, B.
Vol. 16 , pp. 0-0
210 views DOI
Journament Score
42.0/100 · Below Average
Ranked #1,210 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

67.3/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

64.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.