Indexed in Journament

contemporary clinical trials communications

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.1/100
Journament Score
#9,921
Journament Rank
58
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name contemp clin trials commun
Abbreviated Name contemporary clinical trials communications
ISSN 0000-0000

Indexings

scopus ncbi doaj

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (58)

2019
Design of the patient navigator to Reduce Readmissions (PArTNER) study: A pragmatic clinical effectiveness trial.
Vol. 15 , pp. 100420
654 views DOI Abstract
2017
The Vitamin D for Enhancing the Immune System in Cystic Fibrosis (DISC) trial: Rationale and design of a multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of high dose bolus administration of vitamin D3 during acute pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosis
Vol. 6 , No. C , pp. 39-45
488 views Abstract
2017
the superficial and deep retinal capillary plexus in cases of fovea plana imaged by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography
Vol. 6 , No. C , pp. 41-44
479 views DOI Abstract
2018
Long title: Protocol for evaluating a Consultation for Suffering at work in French-speaking Switzerland
Vol. 9 , No. C , pp. 71-76
461 views Abstract
2019
Shared decision making in IBD: A novel approach to trial consent and timing.
Vol. 16 , pp. 100447
442 views DOI Abstract
2017
results with the boston type i keratoprosthesis after acanthamoeba keratitis
Vol. 6 , No. C , pp. 71-73
441 views DOI Abstract
2018
Outpatient versus inpatient mixed meal tolerance and arginine stimulation testing yields comparable measures of variability for assessment of beta cell function.
Vol. 10 , pp. 94-99
440 views DOI Abstract
2018
visual acuity of 20/32, 13.5 years after a retinal pigment epithelium and choroid graft transplantation
Vol. 10 , pp. 62-64
414 views Abstract
2020
Audience segmentation as a strategy for enhancing the use of research registries for recruiting patients into clinical trials.
Vol. 17 , pp. 100510
413 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effectiveness and safety of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria using either dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine or artesunate-amodiaquine in reducing malaria related morbidities and improving cognitive ability in school-aged children in Tanzania: A study protocol for a controlled randomised trial.
Vol. 17 , pp. 100546
325 views DOI Abstract
2020
A ResearchKit app to deliver paediatric electronic consent: Protocol of an observational study in adolescents with arthritis.
Vol. 17 , pp. 100525
277 views DOI Abstract
2020
Audience segmentation as a strategy for enhancing the use of research registries for recruiting patients into clinical trials.
Vol. 17 , pp. 100510
413 views DOI Abstract
2020
Development and application of a primer and reference assessment tool for neonatal abstinence syndrome: A phase I pilot study.
Vol. 17 , pp. 100494
310 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.