Indexed in Journament

energy policy

ISSN 0301-4215· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,528 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
88 Articles
Scores higher than 57.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name energy policy
Abbreviated Name energy policy
ISSN 0301-4215
URL http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy-policy

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 50.0 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 4.3 13.4
Content Distribution 66.6 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (88)

2011
design, synthesis and antitumor activity of c3/c3 bis-fluoroquonolones cross-linked with [1,2,4]triazolo[3,4-b] [1,3,4]thiadiazole
;Guo-qiang Hu;Yong Yang;Lei Yi;Guo-qiang Wang;Nan-nan Duan;Xiao-yi Wen;Tie-yao Cao;Song-qiang Xie;Wen-Long Huang
Vol. 1 , No. 3 , pp. 172-177
501 views DOI Abstract
2019
An experimental approach to climate finance: the impact of auction design and policy uncertainty on renewable energy equity costs in Europe
Botta, E.
Vol. 133 , pp. 0-0
436 views DOI
2019
Behavioral study of personalized automated demand response in the workplace
Ida T.
Vol. 132 , pp. 1009-1016
426 views DOI
2012
prodrug design, synthesis and pharmacokinetic evaluation of (3′r, 4′r)-3-hydroxymethyl-4-methyl-3′, 4′-di-o-(s)-camphanoyl-(+)-cis-khellactone
;Huanfang Guo;Xiaomei Zhuang;Keduo Qian;Lianqi Sun;Xiaofeng Wang;Hua Li;Kuohsiung Lee;Lan Xie
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 213-219
423 views DOI Abstract
2017
remodeling the blood–brain barrier microenvironment by natural products for brain tumor therapy
;Xiao Zhao;Rujing Chen;Mei Liu;Jianfang Feng;Jun Chen;Kaili Hu
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. 541-553
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
Corrigendum to “Pricing emergency service of dynamic microgrid as a measure to increase distribution resilience” [Energy Policy 111 (2017) 321–335] (Energy Policy (2017) 111 (321–335), (S0301421517306110), (10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.043))
(Rick)Shang, D.
Vol. 127 , pp. 533
362 views DOI
2011
a high expression egfr/cell membrane chromatography and online high performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry method for screening egfr antagonists from rhizoma polygoni cuspidati
;Meng Sun;Yan-min Zhang;Jie Zhang;Si-cen Wang;Lang-chong He
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 115-120
360 views DOI Abstract
2016
synthesis and biological evaluation of 12-n-p-chlorobenzyl sophoridinol derivatives as a novel family of anticancer agents
;Chongwen Bi;Cheng Ye;Yinghong Li;Wuli Zhao;Rongguang Shao;Danqing Song
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 222-228
349 views DOI Abstract
2013
transcriptional regulation of vegf expression by estrogen-related receptor γ
;Jichao Liang;Fengmei Han;Yong Chen
Vol. 3 , No. 6 , pp. 373-380
341 views DOI Abstract
2016
targeted and effective photodynamic therapy for cancer using functionalized nanomaterials
;Eun Ji Hong;Dae Gun Choi;Min Suk Shim
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 297-307
338 views DOI Abstract
2020
The spatial economics of energy justice: modelling the trade impacts of increased transport costs in a low carbon transition and the implications for UK regional inequality
Olner, D.
Vol. 140 , pp. 0-0
105 views DOI
2020
Economics of energy subsidy reforms in Bangladesh
Timilsina, G.R.
Vol. 142 , pp. 0-0
135 views DOI
2020
Technological intrusion and communicative renewal: The case of two rural solar farm developments in the UK
Nicholls, J.
Vol. 139 , pp. 0-0
67 views DOI
2020
Maritime piracy in the Strait of Hormuz and implications of energy export security
Shepard, J.U.
Vol. 140 , pp. 0-0
100 views DOI
2020
Mapping wind-power controversies on social media: Facebook as a powerful mobilizer of local resistance
Borch, K.
Vol. 138 , pp. 0-0
197 views DOI
2020
Taxing crude oil: A financing alternative to mitigate climate change?
Antón, A.
Vol. 136 , pp. 0-0
174 views DOI
2019
Enacting a low-carbon economy: Policies and distrust between government employees and enterprises in China
Liu, Y.
Vol. 130 , pp. 130-138
116 views DOI
2019
Socio-economic determinants of energy poverty amongst Indian households: A case study of Mumbai
Sharma, S.
Vol. 132 , pp. 1184-1190
105 views DOI
2019
Assessing the determinants and drivers of multidimensional energy poverty in Ghana
Crentsil, A.
Vol. 133 , pp. 0-0
146 views DOI
2019
Structural energy poverty vulnerability and excess winter mortality in the European Union: Exploring the association between structural determinants and health
Recalde, M.
Vol. 133 , pp. 0-0
113 views DOI
Journament Score
36.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,528 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

50.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

66.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.