energy policy | Journament

Journal Ranking

#701 / 33,939
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

energy policy

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci soc
Short Name energy policy
Abbreviated Name energy policy
ISSN 0301-4215
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy-policy
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (88 total)

2011
design, synthesis and antitumor activity of c3/c3 bis-fluoroquonolones cross-linked with [1,2,4]triazolo[3,4-b] [1,3,4]thiadiazole
;Guo-qiang Hu;Yong Yang;Lei Yi;Guo-qiang Wang;Nan-nan Duan;Xiao-yi Wen;Tie-yao Cao;Song-qiang Xie;Wen-Long Huang
Vol. 1 , No. 3 , pp. 172-177
463 views DOI Abstract
2019
An experimental approach to climate finance: the impact of auction design and policy uncertainty on renewable energy equity costs in Europe
Botta, E.
Vol. 133 , pp. 0-0
389 views DOI
2019
Behavioral study of personalized automated demand response in the workplace
Ida T.
Vol. 132 , pp. 1009-1016
385 views DOI
2012
prodrug design, synthesis and pharmacokinetic evaluation of (3′r, 4′r)-3-hydroxymethyl-4-methyl-3′, 4′-di-o-(s)-camphanoyl-(+)-cis-khellactone
;Huanfang Guo;Xiaomei Zhuang;Keduo Qian;Lianqi Sun;Xiaofeng Wang;Hua Li;Kuohsiung Lee;Lan Xie
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 213-219
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
Corrigendum to “Pricing emergency service of dynamic microgrid as a measure to increase distribution resilience” [Energy Policy 111 (2017) 321–335] (Energy Policy (2017) 111 (321–335), (S0301421517306110), (10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.043))
(Rick)Shang, D.
Vol. 127 , pp. 533
321 views DOI
2017
remodeling the blood–brain barrier microenvironment by natural products for brain tumor therapy
;Xiao Zhao;Rujing Chen;Mei Liu;Jianfang Feng;Jun Chen;Kaili Hu
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. 541-553
321 views DOI Abstract
2011
a high expression egfr/cell membrane chromatography and online high performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry method for screening egfr antagonists from rhizoma polygoni cuspidati
;Meng Sun;Yan-min Zhang;Jie Zhang;Si-cen Wang;Lang-chong He
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 115-120
300 views DOI Abstract
2016
targeted and effective photodynamic therapy for cancer using functionalized nanomaterials
;Eun Ji Hong;Dae Gun Choi;Min Suk Shim
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 297-307
299 views DOI Abstract
2016
synthesis and biological evaluation of 12-n-p-chlorobenzyl sophoridinol derivatives as a novel family of anticancer agents
;Chongwen Bi;Cheng Ye;Yinghong Li;Wuli Zhao;Rongguang Shao;Danqing Song
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 222-228
291 views DOI Abstract
2018
beneficial effects of houttuynia cordata polysaccharides on “two-hit” acute lung injury and endotoxic fever in rats associated with anti-complementary activities
;Yan Lu;Yun Jiang;Lijun Ling;Yunyi Zhang;Hong Li;Daofeng Chen
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 218-227
281 views Abstract
View All 88 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.