Indexed in Journament

american journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the national kidney foundation

ISSN 1523-6838· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
43.8/100
Journament Score
#527
Journament Rank
11
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name am j kidney dis
Abbreviated Name am j kidney dis
ISSN 1523-6838
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/american-journal-of-kidney-diseases

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (11)

2018
A Comparative Study of Carvedilol Versus Metoprolol Initiation and 1-Year Mortality Among Individuals Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis.
Vol. 72 , No. 3 , pp. 337-348
438 views DOI Abstract
2019
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Dosing in Critically Ill Patients: A Quality Improvement Initiative.
424 views DOI Abstract
2019
Change in Albuminuria and GFR as End Points for Clinical Trials in Early Stages of CKD: A Scientific Workshop Sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation in Collaboration With the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency.
411 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient Navigation: Addressing Social Challenges in Dialysis Patients.
406 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nephrology in the Academic Intensive Care Unit: A Qualitative Study of Interdisciplinary Collaboration.
386 views DOI Abstract
2014
Biochemical parameters after cholecalciferol repletion in hemodialysis: results From the VitaDial randomized trial.
Vol. 64 , No. 5 , pp. 696-705
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
Multicenter Outbreak of Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections in Hemodialysis Patients.
366 views DOI Abstract
2020
Serologic Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Hemodialysis Centers: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in Wuhan, China.
342 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of Sevelamer Carbonate in Patients With CKD and Proteinuria: The ANSWER Randomized Trial.
Vol. 74 , No. 3 , pp. 338-350
310 views DOI Abstract
2019
CKD in China: Evolving Spectrum and Public Health Implications.
310 views DOI Abstract
2020
Serologic Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Hemodialysis Centers: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in Wuhan, China.
342 views DOI Abstract
2019
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Dosing in Critically Ill Patients: A Quality Improvement Initiative.
424 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient Navigation: Addressing Social Challenges in Dialysis Patients.
406 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nephrology in the Academic Intensive Care Unit: A Qualitative Study of Interdisciplinary Collaboration.
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
CKD in China: Evolving Spectrum and Public Health Implications.
310 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of Sevelamer Carbonate in Patients With CKD and Proteinuria: The ANSWER Randomized Trial.
Vol. 74 , No. 3 , pp. 338-350
310 views DOI Abstract
2019
Change in Albuminuria and GFR as End Points for Clinical Trials in Early Stages of CKD: A Scientific Workshop Sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation in Collaboration With the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency.
411 views DOI Abstract
2019
Multicenter Outbreak of Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections in Hemodialysis Patients.
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
The AJKD Editorial Internship: Insights From the Inaugural Class of Editorial Interns.
Vol. 74 , No. 3 , pp. 287-289
245 views DOI
2018
A Comparative Study of Carvedilol Versus Metoprolol Initiation and 1-Year Mortality Among Individuals Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis.
Vol. 72 , No. 3 , pp. 337-348
438 views DOI Abstract
44
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

43.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.