Indexed in Journament

Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine

ISSN 1757-7241· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
43.6/100
Journament Score
#601
Journament Rank
9
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med
Abbreviated Name scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine
ISSN 1757-7241
URL https://sjtrem.biomedcentral.com

Indexings

ncbi doaj

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (9)

2018
Treat me nice! –a cross-sectional study examining support during the first year in the emergency medical services
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
403 views Abstract
2019
Impact of traumatic events incurred by asylum-seekers on mental health and utilization of medical services.
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. 85
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
Clinical reasoning in the emergency medical services: an integrative review.
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. 76
370 views DOI Abstract
2011
Trauma admissions to the intensive care unit at a reference hospital in Northwestern Tanzania.
Vol. 19 , pp. 61
323 views DOI Abstract
2020
Serious conditions among patients with non-specific chief complaints in the pre-hospital setting: a retrospective cohort study.
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 74
296 views DOI Abstract
2018
Mechanical versus manual chest compressions in the treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest patients in a non-shockable rhythm: a randomised controlled feasibility trial (COMPRESS-RCT).
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 70
293 views DOI Abstract
2012
Hospital incident command system (HICS) performance in Iran; decision making during disasters
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 14-
279 views Abstract
2020
Nonspecific complaints in the emergency department – a systematic review
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
227 views Abstract
2020
Serious conditions among patients with non-specific chief complaints in the pre-hospital setting: a retrospective cohort study.
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 74
296 views DOI Abstract
2020
Nonspecific complaints in the emergency department – a systematic review
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
227 views Abstract
2019
Clinical reasoning in the emergency medical services: an integrative review.
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. 76
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of traumatic events incurred by asylum-seekers on mental health and utilization of medical services.
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. 85
374 views DOI Abstract
2018
Mechanical versus manual chest compressions in the treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest patients in a non-shockable rhythm: a randomised controlled feasibility trial (COMPRESS-RCT).
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 70
293 views DOI Abstract
2018
Treat me nice! –a cross-sectional study examining support during the first year in the emergency medical services
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
403 views Abstract
2012
Hospital incident command system (HICS) performance in Iran; decision making during disasters
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 14-
279 views Abstract
2011
Trauma admissions to the intensive care unit at a reference hospital in Northwestern Tanzania.
Vol. 19 , pp. 61
323 views DOI Abstract
44
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

43.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.