safety science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#517 / 33,950
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

safety science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name saf sci
Abbreviated Name safety science
ISSN 0925-7535
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/safety-science
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (86 total)

2019
Are employee surveys biased? Impression management as a response bias in workplace safety constructs
Keiser N.
Vol. 118 , pp. 453-465
409 views DOI
2019
Causal inferences of external–contextual domains on complex construction, safety, health and environment regulation
Umeokafor, N.
Vol. 118 , pp. 379-388
398 views DOI
2019
Musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace: Development of a systems thinking-based prototype classification scheme to better understand the risks
Goode N.
Vol. 120 , pp. 146-156
387 views DOI
2019
The moderating effect of long-haul truck drivers’ occupational tenure on the relationship between safety climate and driving safety behavior
Murphy, L.
Vol. 120 , pp. 283-289
363 views DOI
2019
Occupational health and safety in construction industry in Pakistan using modified-SIRA method
Khan, M.
Vol. 118 , pp. 109-118
356 views DOI
2020
Initial impacts of global risk mitigation measures taken during the combatting of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Bruinen de Bruin, Yuri;Lequarre, Anne-Sophie;McCourt, Josephine;Clevestig, Peter;Pigazzani, Filippo;Zare Jeddi, Maryam;Colosio, Claudio;Goulart, Margarida;
, pp. 104773
340 views DOI Abstract
2019
Heat-related knowledge, perceptions, and barriers among oil spill cleanup responders
Jacklitsch, B.
Vol. 120 , pp. 666-671
339 views DOI
2013
quality of life, pulmonary spirometry, and dosage of steroid in asthmatic patients with polyposis after endoscopic sinus surgery
;Bijan Khademi;Behrooz Gandomi;Mehdi Tarzi;Firoozeh Yeganeh
Vol. 25 , No. 71 , pp. 103-106
325 views Abstract
2019
The influence of occupational calling on safety performance among train drivers: The role of work engagement and perceived organizational support
Liu, Y.
Vol. 120 , pp. 374-382
315 views DOI
2018
enhancing working memory capacity in persian cochlear implanted children: a clinical trial study
;Afsaneh Doosti;Maryam Jalalipour;Tayebeh Ahmadi;Seyed Basir Hashemi;Shapour Haghjou;Enayatollah Bakhshi
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 77-83
291 views DOI Abstract
View All 86 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.