Indexed in Journament

Iranian journal of public health

ISSN 2251-6085· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
44.8 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #398 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
32 Articles
Scores higher than 98.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Iran J Public Health
Abbreviated Name iranian journal of public health
ISSN 2251-6085
URL https://ijph.tums.ac.ir

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 60.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.0
Content Distribution 74.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Iranian journal of public health
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 60.0 5.8
Diversity 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 10.0 5.8
Content Distribution 74.1 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (32)

2015
300 neonatal clubfeet evaluated at birth: statistical analysis
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 27-31
440 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of Occupational Stress on Blood Lipids, Blood Sugar and Immune Function of Doctors.
Vol. 48 , No. 5 , pp. 825-833
416 views Abstract
2019
Development of Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Procedure for Trace Determination of Malathion Pesticide in Urine Samples.
Vol. 48 , No. 10 , pp. 1893-1902
405 views Abstract
2019
Comparison of Head and Neck Cancer Distribution in Turkish and Syrian Populations.
Vol. 48 , No. 10 , pp. 1810-1816
398 views Abstract
2019
Regional Cooperative Pollution Control and Residents' Health Expenditures: Empirical Evidence from China.
Vol. 48 , No. 6 , pp. 1033-1042
390 views Abstract
2019
Correlations among Work Stressors, Work Stress Responses, and Subjective Well-Being of Civil Servants: Empirical Evidence from China.
Vol. 48 , No. 6 , pp. 1059-1067
368 views Abstract
2019
An Overview of the Strengths and Challenges Related to Health on the First 10 Days after the Large Earthquake in the West of Iran, 2017.
Vol. 48 , No. 5 , pp. 963-970
365 views Abstract
2019
Anti-Oxidative and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Kenya Grade AA Green Coffee Bean Extracts.
Vol. 48 , No. 11 , pp. 2025-2034
355 views Abstract
2018
Policies to Promote Medical Tourism in Korea: A Narrative Review.
Vol. 47 , No. 8 , pp. 1077-1083
346 views Abstract
2019
Some Effective Factors on the Webometric Status of Selected Universities of Medical Sciences: Lessons Learned from Iran.
Vol. 48 , No. 6 , pp. 1116-1123
233 views Abstract
2019
Anti-Oxidative and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Kenya Grade AA Green Coffee Bean Extracts.
Vol. 48 , No. 11 , pp. 2025-2034
355 views Abstract
2019
Comparison of Head and Neck Cancer Distribution in Turkish and Syrian Populations.
Vol. 48 , No. 10 , pp. 1810-1816
398 views Abstract
2019
Development of Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Procedure for Trace Determination of Malathion Pesticide in Urine Samples.
Vol. 48 , No. 10 , pp. 1893-1902
405 views Abstract
Journament Score
44.8/100 · Below Average
Ranked #398 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

44.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

74.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.