Indexed in Journament

Ergonomics

ISSN 1366-5847· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.9/100
Journament Score
#9,965
Journament Rank
32
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Ergonomics
Abbreviated Name ergonomics
ISSN 1366-5847
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/terg20/current

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (32)

2014
chronic heart failure of ischemic genesis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: possibilities of combination therapy including nebivolol
Vol. 7 , No. 3-4 , pp. 40-47
549 views Abstract
2019
To what extent do paramedics apply safe handling principles when transferring patients from stair chairs to stretchers?
, pp. 1-40
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
Burnout among pilots: psychosocial factors related to happiness and performance at simulator training.
Vol. 62 , No. 2 , pp. 233-245
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
Location choices of face-to-face interactions in academic buildings: An experience sampling approach.
, pp. 1-41
364 views DOI Abstract
2020
Measurement and identification of mental workload during simulated computer tasks with multimodal methods and machine learning.
, pp. 1-32
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing human factors and ergonomics capability in organizations - The Human Factors Integration Toolset.
, pp. 1-30
347 views DOI Abstract
2005
The effect of office concepts on worker health and performance: a systematic review of the literature.
Vol. 48 , No. 2 , pp. 119-34
338 views Abstract
2020
Job rotation and work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a fatigue-failure perspective.
, pp. 1-22
327 views DOI Abstract
2020
Interaction-centred design: an end user evaluation of road intersection concepts developed using the Cognitive Work Analysis Design Toolkit (CWA-DT).
, pp. 1-41
322 views DOI Abstract
2020
How do pedestrians distribute their visual attention when walking through a parking garage? An eye-tracking study.
, pp. 1-16
261 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effect of object and human-factor characteristics on the preference of thumb-index finger grasp type.
, pp. 1-14
20 views DOI Abstract
2020
Interaction-centred design: an end user evaluation of road intersection concepts developed using the Cognitive Work Analysis Design Toolkit (CWA-DT).
, pp. 1-41
322 views DOI Abstract
2020
Measurement and identification of mental workload during simulated computer tasks with multimodal methods and machine learning.
, pp. 1-32
351 views DOI Abstract
2020
Job rotation and work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a fatigue-failure perspective.
, pp. 1-22
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
Burnout among pilots: psychosocial factors related to happiness and performance at simulator training.
Vol. 62 , No. 2 , pp. 233-245
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
Learning rate and subjective mental workload in five truck driving tasks.
Vol. 62 , No. 3 , pp. 391-405
291 views DOI Abstract
2019
Applications of an interaction, process, integration and intelligence (IPII) design approach for ergonomics solutions.
Vol. 62 , No. 7 , pp. 954-980
233 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing human factors and ergonomics capability in organizations - The Human Factors Integration Toolset.
, pp. 1-30
347 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.