Indexed in Journament

Ergonomics

ISSN 1366-5847· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #10,054 of 29,298 scored journals (34,014 indexed)
32 Articles
Scores higher than 65.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Ergonomics
Abbreviated Name ergonomics
ISSN 1366-5847
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/terg20/current

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.0
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 39.7 20.9
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 7.1 4.1
Content Distribution 58.1 88.8
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (32)

2014
СРАВНЕНИЕ ВЛИЯНИЯ ДЛИТЕЛЬНОЙ ТЕРАПИИ, ОСНОВАННОЙ НА КАРВЕДИЛОЛЕ И БИСОПРОЛОЛЕ, НА МЕТАБОЛИЧЕСКИЕ ПАРАМЕТРЫ И ЭРЕКТИЛЬНУЮ ФУНКЦИЮ У БОЛЬНЫХ АРТЕРИАЛЬНОЙ ГИПЕРТОНИЕЙ И ИЗБЫТОЧНОЙ МАССОЙ ТЕЛА ИЛИ ОЖИРЕНИЕМ: РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ РАНДОМИЗИРОВАННОГО, ОТКРЫТОГО, ПАРАЛЛЕЛЬ
;S. Y. Martsevich;S. N. Tolpygina
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 15-25
589 views Abstract
2014
chronic heart failure of ischemic genesis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: possibilities of combination therapy including nebivolol
;P. A. Fedotov;M. Yu. Sitnikova;N. V. Safyanova;N. L. Shaporova
Vol. 7 , No. 3-4 , pp. 40-47
575 views Abstract
2019
To what extent do paramedics apply safe handling principles when transferring patients from stair chairs to stretchers?
Larouche, Dominique;Corbeil, Philippe;Bellemare, Marie;Authier, Marie;Prairie, Jérôme;Hegg-Deloye, Sandrine;
, pp. 1-40
422 views DOI Abstract
2019
Burnout among pilots: psychosocial factors related to happiness and performance at simulator training.
Demerouti, Evangelia;Veldhuis, Wouter;Coombes, Claire;Hunter, Rob;
Vol. 62 , No. 2 , pp. 233-245
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
Location choices of face-to-face interactions in academic buildings: An experience sampling approach.
Weijs-Perrée, Minou;Bück, Lorell;Appel-Meulenbroek, Rianne;Arentze, Theo;
, pp. 1-41
389 views DOI Abstract
2020
Measurement and identification of mental workload during simulated computer tasks with multimodal methods and machine learning.
Ding, Yi;Cao, Yaqin;Duffy, Vincent G;Wang, Yi;Xuefeng, Zhang;
, pp. 1-32
387 views DOI Abstract
2005
The effect of office concepts on worker health and performance: a systematic review of the literature.
De Croon, Einar M;Sluiter, Judith K;Kuijer, P Paul F M;Frings-Dresen, Monique H W;
Vol. 48 , No. 2 , pp. 119-34
377 views Abstract
2019
Assessing human factors and ergonomics capability in organizations - The Human Factors Integration Toolset.
Greig, Michael A;Village, Judy;Dixon, Shane M;Salustri, Filippo A;Neumann, W Patrick;
, pp. 1-30
375 views DOI Abstract
2020
Job rotation and work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a fatigue-failure perspective.
Mehdizadeh, Amir;Vinel, Alexander;Hu, Qiong;Schall, Mark C;Gallagher, Sean;Sesek, Richard F;
, pp. 1-22
362 views DOI Abstract
2020
Interaction-centred design: an end user evaluation of road intersection concepts developed using the Cognitive Work Analysis Design Toolkit (CWA-DT).
Read, Gemma J M;Salmon, Paul M;Goode, Natassia;van Mulken, Michelle;Lenné, Michael G;Stevens, Nicholas;Walker, G H;
, pp. 1-41
356 views DOI Abstract
2020
How do pedestrians distribute their visual attention when walking through a parking garage? An eye-tracking study.
de Winter, Joost;Bazilinskyy, Pavlo;Wesdorp, Dale;de Vlam, Valerie;Hopmans, Belle;Visscher, Just;Dodou, Dimitra;
, pp. 1-16
294 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effect of object and human-factor characteristics on the preference of thumb-index finger grasp type.
Chen, Xiaojing;Li, Zhiguo;Wang, Yuqing;
, pp. 1-14
54 views DOI Abstract
2020
Interaction-centred design: an end user evaluation of road intersection concepts developed using the Cognitive Work Analysis Design Toolkit (CWA-DT).
Read, Gemma J M;Salmon, Paul M;Goode, Natassia;van Mulken, Michelle;Lenné, Michael G;Stevens, Nicholas;Walker, G H;
, pp. 1-41
356 views DOI Abstract
2020
Measurement and identification of mental workload during simulated computer tasks with multimodal methods and machine learning.
Ding, Yi;Cao, Yaqin;Duffy, Vincent G;Wang, Yi;Xuefeng, Zhang;
, pp. 1-32
387 views DOI Abstract
2020
The human element in future Maritime Operations–perceived impact of autonomous shipping
Mallam, S.C.
Vol. 63 , pp. 334-345
229 views DOI
2020
Job rotation and work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a fatigue-failure perspective.
Mehdizadeh, Amir;Vinel, Alexander;Hu, Qiong;Schall, Mark C;Gallagher, Sean;Sesek, Richard F;
, pp. 1-22
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
Burnout among pilots: psychosocial factors related to happiness and performance at simulator training.
Demerouti, Evangelia;Veldhuis, Wouter;Coombes, Claire;Hunter, Rob;
Vol. 62 , No. 2 , pp. 233-245
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
Learning rate and subjective mental workload in five truck driving tasks.
Chi, Chia-Fen;Cheng, Chih-Chan;Shih, Yuh-Chuan;Sun, I-Sheng;Chang, Tin-Chang;
Vol. 62 , No. 3 , pp. 391-405
340 views DOI Abstract
2019
Applications of an interaction, process, integration and intelligence (IPII) design approach for ergonomics solutions.
Xu, Wei;Furie, Dov;Mahabhaleshwar, Manjunath;Suresh, Bala;Chouhan, Hardev;
Vol. 62 , No. 7 , pp. 954-980
264 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing human factors and ergonomics capability in organizations - The Human Factors Integration Toolset.
Greig, Michael A;Village, Judy;Dixon, Shane M;Salustri, Filippo A;Neumann, W Patrick;
, pp. 1-30
375 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #10,054 of 29,298 scored
(34,014 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

33.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

39.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

58.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.