brazilian journal of pharmacognosy | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1019 / 33,930
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 16 hours ago

brazilian journal of pharmacognosy

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name brazilian journal of pharmacognosy
Abbreviated Name brazilian journal of pharmacognosy
ISSN 0102695X
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/43450
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (39 total)

2014
determining “best interests” in end-of-life decisions for the developmentally disabled: minnesota state guardians and wards
;Mary Lay Schuster;Ann L. Russell;Dianne Bartels;Holli Kelly-Trombley
Vol. 34 , No. 4 , pp. -
480 views DOI Abstract
2018
legal ableism, interrupted: developing tort law & policy alternatives to wrongful birth & wrongful life claims
;Lydia X. Z. Brown
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. -
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
Influence of in vitro micropropagation on lycorine biosynthesis and anticholinesterase activity in Hippeastrum goianum
Costa G.
Vol. 29 , pp. 262-265
297 views DOI
2017
disclosure of mental disability by college and university faculty: the negotiation of accommodations, supports, and barriers
;Margaret Price;Mark S. Salzer;Amber O'Shea;Stephanie L. Kerschbaum
Vol. 37 , No. 2 , pp. -
282 views DOI Abstract
2018
reframing less conventional speech to disrupt conventions of "compulsory fluency": a conversation analysis approach
;Camille Duque;Bonnie Lashewicz
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. -
253 views DOI Abstract
2016
the impact of disability studies curriculum on education professionals' perspectives and practice: implications for education, social justice, and social change
;Holly Pearson
Vol. 36 , No. 2 , pp. -
246 views DOI Abstract
2014
subversive status: disability studies in germany, austria, and switzerland
;Lisa Pfahl;Justin J.W. Powell
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. -
239 views DOI Abstract
2017
from evil queen to disabled teen: frozen introduces disney's first disabled princess
;Michelle Resene
Vol. 37 , No. 2 , pp. -
210 views DOI Abstract
2017
reimagining disability and inclusive education through universal design for learning
;Jan Doolittle Wilson
Vol. 37 , No. 2 , pp. -
210 views DOI Abstract
2014
illuminating the vulnerability of hegemonic masculinity through a performance analysis of physically disabled men’s personal narratives
;Julie-Ann Scott
Vol. 34 , No. 1 , pp. -
209 views DOI Abstract
View All 39 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.