applied psychophysiology and biofeedback | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2691 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

applied psychophysiology and biofeedback

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim soc
Short Name appl psychophysiol biofeedback
Abbreviated Name appl psychophysiol biofeedback
ISSN 1573-3270
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/10484
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (78 total)

2005
persisting reversed clock syndrome
;Christophe Orssaud;Philippe Halimi;Claire Le Jeunne;Jean Louis Dufier
Vol. 16 , No. 4 , pp. 233-236
556 views DOI Abstract
2017
efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation therapy on poststroke depression among survivors of first stroke attack in ibadan, nigeria
;Olugbemi Olukolade;Helen O. Osinowo
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
349 views DOI Abstract
2019
Resting Cardiac Vagal Tone is Associated with Long-Term Frustration Level of Mental Workload: Ultra-short Term Recording Reliability.
Melo, Hiago Murilo;Hoeller, Alexandre Ademar;Walz, Roger;Takase, Emílio;
315 views DOI Abstract
2012
potential consequences of abandonment in preschool-age: neuropsychological findings in institutionalized children
;Juan F. Cardona;Facundo Manes;Josefina Escobar;Jéssica López;Agustín Ibáñez
Vol. 25 , No. 4 , pp. 291-301
314 views DOI Abstract
2014
negative emotions in migraineurs dreams: the increased prevalence of oneiric fear and anguish, unrelated to mood disorders
;F. De Angeli;C. Lovati;L. Giani;C. Mariotti D'Alessandro;E. Raimondi;V. Scaglione;D. Castoldi;E. Capiluppi;C. Mariani
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
301 views DOI Abstract
2011
side of onset in parkinson’s disease and alterations in religiosity: novel behavioral phenotypes
;Paul M. Butler;Patrick McNamara;Raymon Durso
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. 133-141
286 views DOI Abstract
2013
disentangling the neuroanatomical correlates of perseveration from unilateral spatial neglect
;Jonathan T. Kleinman;Jeffery C. DuBois;Melissa Newhart;Argye E. Hillis
Vol. 26 , No. 1-2 , pp. 131-138
285 views DOI
2007
psychic tonus, body schema and the parietal lobes: a multiple lesion case analysis
;C. M. J. Braun;S. Desjardins;S. Gaudelet;A. Guimond
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 65-80
279 views DOI Abstract
2015
traumatic brain injury rehabilitation in hong kong: a review of practice and research
;Junhong Yu;Helena M. K. Tam;Tatia M. C. Lee
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
264 views DOI Abstract
1994
progressive perceptual-motor impairment without generalized dementia: a type of cortical degenerative syndrome
;K. Abe;S. Yorifuji;H. Tanabe;T. Yanagihara
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 83-86
264 views DOI Abstract
View All 78 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.