Indexed in Journament

plastic and reconstructive surgery

ISSN 1529-4242· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,184 of 29,297 scored journals (34,016 indexed)
18 Articles
Scores higher than 89.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name plast reconstr surg
Abbreviated Name plast reconstr surg
ISSN 1529-4242
URL http://www.plasreconsurg.com

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.5
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 64.8 26.4
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 7.1 4.5
Content Distribution 68.5 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (18)

1972
The treatment of dog bite injuries, especially those of the face
Schultz RC;McMaster WC;;
Vol. 49 , No. 5 , pp. -
502 views Abstract
2020
Facial Aging: A 54-Year, Three-Dimensional Population Study.
Lambros, Val;
Vol. 145 , No. 4 , pp. 921-928
472 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Alignment of the Nose in Rhinoplasty: Fix Down Concept.
Taş, Süleyman;
Vol. 145 , No. 2 , pp. 378-389
444 views DOI Abstract
2020
Impact of Physician Payments on Microvascular Breast Reconstruction: An All-Payer Claim Database Analysis.
Panchal, Hina;Shamsunder, Meghana G;Sheinin, Avraham;Sheckter, Clifford C;Berlin, Nicholas L;Nelson, Jonas A;Allen, Robert;Rubin, David;Kozlow, Jeffrey H;Matros, Evan;
Vol. 145 , No. 2 , pp. 333-339
435 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reply: The Difference between Trends and Standards on Gluteal Aesthetics: The Impact of Social Media on Beauty Preferences.
Rosique, Rodrigo G;Rosique, Marina J F;
Vol. 144 , No. 4 , pp. 712e-713e
421 views DOI
2019
Is There Gender Inequality in Plastic Surgery? Evaluation of Society Leadership and Composition of Editorial Boards.
Chen, Kevin;Ha, Grace;Schultz, Benjamin D;Zhang, Ben;Smith, Mark L;Bradley, James P;Thorne, Charles H;Kasabian, Armen K;Pusic, Andrea L;Tanna, Neil;
420 views DOI Abstract
2005
Certificate-of-Need regulation in outpatient surgery and specialty care: implications for plastic surgeons.
Pacella, Salvatore J;Comstock, Matthew;Kuzon, William M;
Vol. 116 , No. 4 , pp. 1103-11; discussion 1112-3
415 views Abstract
2005
Innovation: a sustainable competitive advantage for plastic and reconstructive surgery.
Longaker, Michael T;Rohrich, Rod J;
Vol. 115 , No. 7 , pp. 2135-6
398 views
2019
"Single intraosseous injection of simvastatin promotes endothelial progenitor cell mobilization, neovascularization, and wound healing in diabetic rats".
Can, Liu;Junxiong, Zhu;Bao, Hai;Wen, Zhang;Hong, Wang;Huijie, Leng;Yingsheng, Xu;Chunli, Song;
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nonbiological Microsurgery Simulators in Plastic Surgery Training: A Systematic Review.
Abi-Rafeh, Jad;Zammit, Dino;Mojtahed Jaberi, Mehrad;Al-Halabi, Becher;Thibaudeau, Stephanie;
Vol. 144 , No. 3 , pp. 496e-507e
366 views DOI Abstract
2021
It's Okay to Say "I'm Sorry"
Rohrich, R.J.
Vol. 148 , pp. 48S-50S
35 views DOI
2021
Botulism due to Cosmetic Injection of Botulinum Toxin: Five-Year Experience
Chen Z;Chen ZY;Liu WH;Li GS;;
, pp. -
146 views Abstract
2020
Facial Aging: A 54-Year, Three-Dimensional Population Study.
Lambros, Val;
Vol. 145 , No. 4 , pp. 921-928
472 views DOI Abstract
2020
Re: Letter to the editor on "Outcomes, challenges and pitfalls after targeted muscle reinnervation in high level amputees. Is it worth the effort?"
Salminger, Stefan;Gstoettner, Clemens;Mayer, Johannes A;Aszmann, Oskar C;
223 views DOI
2020
REPLY TO LETTER.
Del Piñal, Francisco;
91 views DOI
2020
Letter to the editor on: "Outcomes, challenges and pitfalls after targeted muscle reinnervation in high level amputees. Is it worth the effort?"
Loewenstein, Scott Nathan;Adkinson, Joshua M;
257 views DOI
2020
The Alignment of the Nose in Rhinoplasty: Fix Down Concept.
Taş, Süleyman;
Vol. 145 , No. 2 , pp. 378-389
444 views DOI Abstract
2020
Impact of Physician Payments on Microvascular Breast Reconstruction: An All-Payer Claim Database Analysis.
Panchal, Hina;Shamsunder, Meghana G;Sheinin, Avraham;Sheckter, Clifford C;Berlin, Nicholas L;Nelson, Jonas A;Allen, Robert;Rubin, David;Kozlow, Jeffrey H;Matros, Evan;
Vol. 145 , No. 2 , pp. 333-339
435 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reply: The Difference between Trends and Standards on Gluteal Aesthetics: The Impact of Social Media on Beauty Preferences.
Rosique, Rodrigo G;Rosique, Marina J F;
Vol. 144 , No. 4 , pp. 712e-713e
421 views DOI
2019
Is There Gender Inequality in Plastic Surgery? Evaluation of Society Leadership and Composition of Editorial Boards.
Chen, Kevin;Ha, Grace;Schultz, Benjamin D;Zhang, Ben;Smith, Mark L;Bradley, James P;Thorne, Charles H;Kasabian, Armen K;Pusic, Andrea L;Tanna, Neil;
420 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
39.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,184 of 29,297 scored
(34,016 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

64.8/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

68.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.