BMC medical education | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2797 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

BMC medical education

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci soc
Short Name BMC Med Educ
Abbreviated Name bmc med educ
ISSN 1472-6920
Aim and Scope
URL https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (146 total)

2007
Psychological morbidity, sources of stress and coping strategies among undergraduate medical students of Nepal
Chiranjoy, Mukhopadhyay;VS, Binu;R, Shankar Pathiyil;T, Sreeramareddy Chandrashekhar;Biswabina, Ray;G, Menezes Ritesh;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 26-
954 views Abstract
2017
Implementation of a novel population panel management curriculum among interprofessional health care trainees
Kaminetzky, Catherine P.;Beste, Lauren A.;Poppe, Anne P.;Doan, Daniel B.;Mun, Howard K.;Woods, Nancy Fugate;Wipf, Joyce E.;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 1-8
806 views Abstract
2011
Lessons learnt from comprehensive evaluation of community-based education in Uganda: a proposal for an ideal model community-based education for health professional training institutions
Lynn, Atuyambe;Hussein, Oria;C, Nabirye Rose;Isaac, Okullo;N, Mbalinda Scovia;Steven, Kijjambu;N, Kasozi Ann;W, Muhwezi Wilson;K, Kaye Dan;Sarah, Groves;Gilbert, Burnham;Andrew, Mwanika;
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 7-
713 views Abstract
2018
The development of a training course for clubfoot treatment in Africa: learning points for course development
Smythe, Tracey;Le, Grace;Owen, Rosalind;Ayana, Birhanu;Hansen, Linda;Lavy, Christopher;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
525 views Abstract
2018
Development and evaluation of a standardized peer-training in the context of peer review for quality assurance in work capacity evaluation
Strahl, André;Gerlich, Christian;Alpers, Georg W.;Ehrmann, Katja;Gehrke, Jörg;Müller-Garnn, Annette;Vogel, Heiner;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
519 views Abstract
2018
The relationship between learning styles and academic performance in TURKISH physiotherapy students 13 Education 1303 Specialist Studies in Education
Ilçin, N.
Vol. 18 , pp. 0-0
484 views DOI
2019
A pilot study of a pharmacist-led prescribing program for final-year medical students
Newby, David A.;Stokes, Barrie;Smith, Anthony J.;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
482 views Abstract
2018
What motivates medical students to select medical studies: a systematic literature review
Goel, Sonu;Angeli, Federica;Dhirar, Nonita;Singla, Neetu;Ruwaard, Dirk;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
473 views Abstract
2020
Confidence and motivation to help those with a mental health problem: experiences from a study of nursing students completing mental health first aid (MHFA) training.
Crawford, Gemma;Burns, Sharyn;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 69
447 views DOI Abstract
2019
Needs, motivations, and identification with teaching: a comparative study of temporary part-time and tenure-track health science faculty in Iceland.
Snook, Abigail Grover;Schram, Asta B;Sveinsson, Thorarinn;Jones, Brett D;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 349
437 views DOI Abstract
View All 146 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.