population health management | Journament

Journal Ranking

#459 / 33,939
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

population health management

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name popul health manag
Abbreviated Name popul health manag
ISSN 1942-7905
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.liebertpub.com/pop
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (128 total)

2014
an extended reinforcement learning model of basal ganglia to understand the contributions of serotonin and dopamine in risk-based decision making, reward prediction, and punishment learning
;Pragathi Priyadharsini Balasubramani;Srinivasa eChakravarthy;Ravindran eBalaraman;Ahmed A. Moustafa
Vol. 8 , pp. -
400 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reducing Cardiovascular Disease Risk for Employees Through Participation in a Wellness Program.
Pesis-Katz, Irena;Smith, Joyce A;Norsen, Lisa;DeVoe, Jason;Singh, Renu;
371 views DOI Abstract
2014
the neuronal response at extended timescales: long-term correlations without long-term memory
;Daniel eSoudry;Ron eMeir
Vol. 8 , pp. -
349 views DOI Abstract
2019
Potential Synergies Between Workplace Wellness Programs and On-Site Clinics.
Cohen, Catherine;Liu, Harry H;
338 views DOI
2019
The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Network Antibiotics and Childhood Growth Study: Implementing Patient Data Linkage.
Canterberry, Melanie;Kaul, Alan F;Goel, Satyender;Lin, Pi-I Debby;Block, Jason P;Nair, Vinit P;Ma, Qianli;Carton, Thomas W;
333 views DOI Abstract
2013
using a hybrid neuron in physiologically inspired models of the basal ganglia
;Corey Michael Thibeault;Corey Michael Thibeault;Corey Michael Thibeault;Narayan eSrinivasa
Vol. 7 , pp. -
328 views DOI Abstract
2019
Capacity Building for and Implementation of Policy, Systems, and Environmental Change: Results from a Survey of the National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program.
Townsend, Julie S;Sitaker, Marilyn;Rose, John M;Rohan, Elizabeth A;Gardner, Annette;Moore, Angela R;
Vol. 22 , No. 4 , pp. 330-338
319 views DOI Abstract
2015
a simple transfer function for nonlinear dendritic integration
;Matt eSingh;David eZald
Vol. 9 , pp. -
319 views DOI Abstract
2017
electromyography data processing impacts muscle synergies during gait for unimpaired children and children with cerebral palsy
;Benjamin R. Shuman;Benjamin R. Shuman;Michael H. Schwartz;Michael H. Schwartz;Katherine M. Steele;Katherine M. Steele
Vol. 11 , pp. -
316 views DOI Abstract
2019
Health Care Access and Quality Index and Financing of Health Care Systems
Stankunas, M.
Vol. 22 , pp. 90
304 views DOI
View All 128 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.