bmc musculoskeletal disorders | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2797 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

bmc musculoskeletal disorders

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name bmc musculoskelet disord
Abbreviated Name bmc musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN 1471-2474
Aim and Scope
URL https://bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (76 total)

2008
Intra-articular temperatures of the knee in sports – An in-vivo study of jogging and alpine skiing
Guiliano, Cerulli;Sven, Feil;Jan, Springer;Christoph, Becher;H, Paessler Hans;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 46-
507 views Abstract
2018
Facilitating physical activity and reducing symptoms in patients with knee osteoarthritis: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial to test a theory-based PrevOP-psychological adherence program (PrevOP-PAP)
Knoll, Nina;Hohl, Diana Hilda;Motter, Susannah;Keller, Jan;Lange, Daniela;Felsenberg, Dieter;Martus, Peter;Ertel, Wolfgang;Schwarzer, Ralf;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 1-16
484 views Abstract
2009
A prospective study of prognostic factors for duration of sick leave after endoscopic carpal tunnel release
Jesper, Dalsgaard;Torben, Hansen;Anette, Meldgaard;Kristian, Larsen;
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 144-
449 views Abstract
2019
Technology-assisted rehabilitation following total knee or hip replacement for people with osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang, Xia;Hunter, David J;Vesentini, Giovana;Pozzobon, Daniel;Ferreira, Manuela L;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 506
413 views DOI Abstract
2010
Assessing a risk tailored intervention to prevent disabling low back pain - protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial
Ulf, Marnitz;Gabriele, Lindena;Ruth, Fahland;Michael, Pfingsten;Jean-François, Chenot;Carsten, Schmidt;Klaus, Pfeifer;Thomas, Kohlmann;
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 5-
397 views Abstract
2019
Comparing Australian orthopaedic surgeons' reported use of thromboprophylaxis following arthroplasty in 2012 and 2017.
Mirkazemi, Corinne;Bereznicki, Luke R;Peterson, Gregory M;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 57
390 views DOI Abstract
2020
Technology versus tradition: a non-inferiority trial comparing video to face-to-face consultations with a physiotherapist for people with knee osteoarthritis. Protocol for the PEAK randomised controlled trial.
Hinman, Rana S;Kimp, Alexander J;Campbell, Penny K;Russell, Trevor;Foster, Nadine E;Kasza, Jessica;Harris, Anthony;Bennell, Kim L;
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 522
377 views DOI Abstract
2018
Effectiveness of a new model of primary care management on knee pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis: Protocol for THE PARTNER STUDY.
Hunter, David J;Hinman, Rana S;Bowden, Jocelyn L;Egerton, Thorlene;Briggs, Andrew M;Bunker, Stephen J;Kasza, Jessica;Forbes, Andrew B;French, Simon D;Pirotta, Marie;Schofield, Deborah J;Zwar, Nicholas A;Bennell, Kim L;, ;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 132
364 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prevalence of feet and ankle arthritis and their impact on clinical indices in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study.
Lee, Sung Won;Kim, Seong-Yong;Chang, Sung Hae;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 420
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
Primary outcome measures used in interventional trials for ankle fractures: a systematic review.
McKeown, Rebecca;Rabiu, Abdul-Rasheed;Ellard, David R;Kearney, Rebecca S;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 388
344 views DOI Abstract
View All 76 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.