Indexed in Journament

bmc musculoskeletal disorders

ISSN 1471-2474· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.5/100
Journament Score
#12,256
Journament Rank
76
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name bmc musculoskelet disord
Abbreviated Name bmc musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN 1471-2474
URL https://bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com

Indexings

scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (76)

2008
Intra-articular temperatures of the knee in sports – An in-vivo study of jogging and alpine skiing
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 46-
538 views Abstract
2018
Facilitating physical activity and reducing symptoms in patients with knee osteoarthritis: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial to test a theory-based PrevOP-psychological adherence program (PrevOP-PAP)
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 1-16
508 views Abstract
2009
A prospective study of prognostic factors for duration of sick leave after endoscopic carpal tunnel release
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 144-
472 views Abstract
2019
Technology-assisted rehabilitation following total knee or hip replacement for people with osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 506
457 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparing Australian orthopaedic surgeons' reported use of thromboprophylaxis following arthroplasty in 2012 and 2017.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 57
443 views DOI Abstract
2010
Assessing a risk tailored intervention to prevent disabling low back pain - protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 5-
432 views Abstract
2020
Technology versus tradition: a non-inferiority trial comparing video to face-to-face consultations with a physiotherapist for people with knee osteoarthritis. Protocol for the PEAK randomised controlled trial.
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 522
418 views DOI Abstract
2018
Effectiveness of a new model of primary care management on knee pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis: Protocol for THE PARTNER STUDY.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 132
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prevalence of feet and ankle arthritis and their impact on clinical indices in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 420
398 views DOI Abstract
2019
Primary outcome measures used in interventional trials for ankle fractures: a systematic review.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 388
374 views DOI Abstract
2025
2025
The role of sagittal axis in biceps tenodesis for superior capsular reconstruction in massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.
Vol. 26 , pp. 361
105 views DOI Abstract
2025
Supplemental nucleus pulposus allograft in patients with lumbar discogenic pain: results of a prospective feasibility study.
Vol. 26 , pp. 437
81 views DOI Abstract
2021
2020
Technology versus tradition: a non-inferiority trial comparing video to face-to-face consultations with a physiotherapist for people with knee osteoarthritis. Protocol for the PEAK randomised controlled trial.
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 522
418 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pain neuroscience education and physical exercise for patients with chronic spinal pain in primary healthcare: a randomised trial protocol.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 505
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Technology-assisted rehabilitation following total knee or hip replacement for people with osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 506
457 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparing Australian orthopaedic surgeons' reported use of thromboprophylaxis following arthroplasty in 2012 and 2017.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 57
443 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prevalence of feet and ankle arthritis and their impact on clinical indices in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 420
398 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

37.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.