Indexed in Journament

vertigo

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #2,664 of 29,297 scored journals (34,016 indexed)
15 Articles
Scores higher than 90.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name vertigo
Abbreviated Name vertigo

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.4
Timeliness 20.0
Innovation 63.0
Community Impact 7.9
Content Distribution 71.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.4 30.5
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 20.0 3.0
Diversity — 26.2
Innovation 63.0 24.1
Community Impact 7.9 4.7
Content Distribution 71.4 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2012
Intégration des principes de développement durable au collégial : Le cas du programme de Techniques de tourisme
Lusignan, Marie-Janou;
Vol. 13 , pp. -
485 views Abstract
2015
Infrastructures de données géographiques : quelle contribution à la Gestion intégrée des zones côtières françaises ?
Georis-Creuseveau, Jade;Gourmelon, Françoise;Claramunt, Christophe;
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. -
458 views Abstract
2016
La vulnérabilité de la forêt provençale face aux incendies : naissance d’une notion (fin XIXe siècle)
Chalvet, Martine;
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. -
408 views Abstract
2005
Un pied dans l’eau, un pied sur terre : trajectoires et savoirs sampaniers dans un processus de transfert de la pêche vers l’aquaculture Phù Tân (Vietnam)
Thomassin, Annick;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. -
394 views Abstract
2014
Transhumance et gestion des ressources naturelles au Sahel : contraintes et perspectives face aux mutations des systèmes de productions pastorales
Kiema, André;Tontibomma, Ghislain Bambara;Zampaligré, Nouhoun;
Vol. 14 , No. 3 , pp. -
372 views Abstract
2006
La place des scientifiques dans un processus de gestion intégrée des zones côtières : évaluation des pressions polluantes d’origine terrestre sur la baie du Robert (Martinique)
Rizand, Anne;Mariel, P.;Pinte, K.;
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. -
370 views Abstract
2005
Visages de la biodiversité marine
Brunel, Pierre;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. -
362 views Abstract
2017
Droit foncier et pastoralisme, entre propriété et territoire
Barrière, Olivier;Bes , Cécile;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. -
337 views Abstract
2009
De la recommandation de 2002 au Livre Vert de 2006 : quelle stratégie européenne pour la gestion intégrée des zones côtières (GIZC)
Ghézali, Mahfoud;
, pp. -
330 views Abstract
2010
Quelle stratégie de gestion des risques côtiers pour l'union européenne
Morvan, Didier Le;
, pp. -
270 views Abstract
2023
L’écologie en plus. Des justifications environnementales de la non-procréation
Veaux, Clarisse;Roux, Sébastien;
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. -
63 views Abstract
2017
Corpus de référentiels d’aide à la décision pour la résilience de la production vivrière aux risques climatiques dans la région Maritime au Togo
Sanou, Komi;Badolo, Mathieu;
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. -
200 views Abstract
2017
Droit foncier et pastoralisme, entre propriété et territoire
Barrière, Olivier;Bes , Cécile;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. -
337 views Abstract
2016
La vulnérabilité de la forêt provençale face aux incendies : naissance d’une notion (fin XIXe siècle)
Chalvet, Martine;
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. -
408 views Abstract
2016
L’adaptation du contexte institutionnel : condition sine qua non du développement durable des palmeraies camerounaises
Plédran, Oriane;Rafflegeau, Sylvain;Levang, Patrice;
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. -
203 views Abstract
2015
Infrastructures de données géographiques : quelle contribution à la Gestion intégrée des zones côtières françaises ?
Georis-Creuseveau, Jade;Gourmelon, Françoise;Claramunt, Christophe;
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. -
458 views Abstract
2014
Transhumance et gestion des ressources naturelles au Sahel : contraintes et perspectives face aux mutations des systèmes de productions pastorales
Kiema, André;Tontibomma, Ghislain Bambara;Zampaligré, Nouhoun;
Vol. 14 , No. 3 , pp. -
372 views Abstract
2012
Intégration des principes de développement durable au collégial : Le cas du programme de Techniques de tourisme
Lusignan, Marie-Janou;
Vol. 13 , pp. -
485 views Abstract
2011
Impact de la pollution sur les écosystèmes côtiers : exemple de la Manche orientale
Amara, Rachid;
Vol. 9 , pp. -
162 views Abstract
2010
Quelle stratégie de gestion des risques côtiers pour l'union européenne
Morvan, Didier Le;
, pp. -
270 views Abstract
Journament Score
40.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #2,664 of 29,297 scored
(34,016 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

63.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.