Indexed in Journament

forests

ISSN 1999-4907· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.9/100
Journament Score
#7,124
Journament Rank
43
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name forests
Abbreviated Name forests
ISSN 1999-4907
URL http://www.mdpi.com/journal/forests

Indexings

scopus doaj ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (43)

2019
Pressures and Threats to Nature Related to Human Activities in European Urban and Suburban Forests
Vol. 10 , No. 9 , pp. 765-
433 views Abstract
2016
Exploring Opportunities for Promoting Synergies between Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation in Forest Carbon Initiatives
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 24-
401 views Abstract
2014
Impacts of Frequent Burning on Live Tree Carbon Biomass and Demography in Post-Harvest Regrowth Forest
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 802-821
380 views Abstract
2019
Drivers of Household Decision-Making on Land-Use Transformation: An Example of Woodlot Establishment in Masindi District, Uganda
Vol. 10 , No. 8 , pp. 619-
379 views Abstract
2020
Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Mapping by Random Forest Base Classifier and Its Ensembles in a Semi-Arid Region of Iran
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 421-
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
Individual Tree Diameter Growth Models of Larch–Spruce–Fir Mixed Forests Based on Machine Learning Algorithms
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 187-
377 views Abstract
2018
Mixing Effects in Norway Spruce—European Beech Stands Are Modulated by Site Quality, Stand Age and Moisture Availability
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 83-
353 views Abstract
2020
Tree Ring-Based Estimation of Landslide Areal Reactivation as a Fundament of Magnitude–Frequency Assessment
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 400-
322 views DOI Abstract
2022
Role of Egg Parasitoids in Controlling the Pine Processionary Moth in the Cedar Forests of Chréa National Park (Algeria)
Vol. 13 , No. 211 , pp. 211-
104 views Abstract
2020
Soils in Karst Sinkholes Record the Holocene History of Local Forest Fires at the North of European Russia
Vol. 11 , No. 12 , pp. 1268-
199 views DOI Abstract
2020
Soils in Karst Sinkholes Record the Holocene History of Local Forest Fires at the North of European Russia
Vol. 11 , No. 12 , pp. 1268-
172 views DOI Abstract
2020
Fungi and oomycetes in the irrigationwater of forest nurseries
Vol. 11 , pp. 0-0
130 views DOI
2020
Tree Ring-Based Estimation of Landslide Areal Reactivation as a Fundament of Magnitude–Frequency Assessment
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 400-
322 views DOI Abstract
2020
Landslide Detection and Susceptibility Modeling on Cameron Highlands (Malaysia): A Comparison between Random Forest, Logistic Regression and Logistic Model Tree Algorithms
Vol. 11 , No. 8 , pp. 830-
269 views DOI Abstract
2020
How Well Do Three Tree Species Adapt to the Urban Environment in Guangdong-Hongkong-Macao Greater Bay Area of China Regarding Their Growth Patterns and Ecosystem Services?
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 420-
219 views DOI Abstract
2020
Testing the Effect of Snag and Cavity Supply on Deadwood-Associated Species in a Managed Boreal Forest
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 424-
208 views DOI Abstract
2020
Irrigation of Young Cork Oaks under Field Conditions—Testing the Best Water Volume
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 88-
293 views DOI Abstract
2020
Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Mapping by Random Forest Base Classifier and Its Ensembles in a Semi-Arid Region of Iran
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 421-
377 views DOI Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.