Indexed in Journament

forests

ISSN 1999-4907· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,678 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
43 Articles
Scores higher than 39.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name forests
Abbreviated Name forests
ISSN 1999-4907
URL http://www.mdpi.com/journal/forests

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 7.1
Content Distribution 69.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for forests
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 7.1 13.4
Content Distribution 69.8 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (43)

2019
Pressures and Threats to Nature Related to Human Activities in European Urban and Suburban Forests
Vol. 10 , No. 9 , pp. 765-
443 views Abstract
2016
Exploring Opportunities for Promoting Synergies between Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation in Forest Carbon Initiatives
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 24-
408 views Abstract
2014
Impacts of Frequent Burning on Live Tree Carbon Biomass and Demography in Post-Harvest Regrowth Forest
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 802-821
389 views Abstract
2020
Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Mapping by Random Forest Base Classifier and Its Ensembles in a Semi-Arid Region of Iran
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 421-
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
Individual Tree Diameter Growth Models of Larch–Spruce–Fir Mixed Forests Based on Machine Learning Algorithms
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 187-
386 views Abstract
2019
Drivers of Household Decision-Making on Land-Use Transformation: An Example of Woodlot Establishment in Masindi District, Uganda
Vol. 10 , No. 8 , pp. 619-
385 views Abstract
2018
Mixing Effects in Norway Spruce—European Beech Stands Are Modulated by Site Quality, Stand Age and Moisture Availability
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 83-
360 views Abstract
2020
Tree Ring-Based Estimation of Landslide Areal Reactivation as a Fundament of Magnitude–Frequency Assessment
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 400-
330 views DOI Abstract
2022
Role of Egg Parasitoids in Controlling the Pine Processionary Moth in the Cedar Forests of Chréa National Park (Algeria)
Vol. 13 , No. 211 , pp. 211-
117 views Abstract
2020
Soils in Karst Sinkholes Record the Holocene History of Local Forest Fires at the North of European Russia
Vol. 11 , No. 12 , pp. 1268-
213 views DOI Abstract
2020
Soils in Karst Sinkholes Record the Holocene History of Local Forest Fires at the North of European Russia
Vol. 11 , No. 12 , pp. 1268-
189 views DOI Abstract
2020
Fungi and oomycetes in the irrigationwater of forest nurseries
Vol. 11 , pp. 0-0
140 views DOI
2020
Tree Ring-Based Estimation of Landslide Areal Reactivation as a Fundament of Magnitude–Frequency Assessment
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 400-
330 views DOI Abstract
2020
Landslide Detection and Susceptibility Modeling on Cameron Highlands (Malaysia): A Comparison between Random Forest, Logistic Regression and Logistic Model Tree Algorithms
Vol. 11 , No. 8 , pp. 830-
277 views DOI Abstract
2020
How Well Do Three Tree Species Adapt to the Urban Environment in Guangdong-Hongkong-Macao Greater Bay Area of China Regarding Their Growth Patterns and Ecosystem Services?
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 420-
229 views DOI Abstract
2020
Testing the Effect of Snag and Cavity Supply on Deadwood-Associated Species in a Managed Boreal Forest
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 424-
215 views DOI Abstract
2020
Irrigation of Young Cork Oaks under Field Conditions—Testing the Best Water Volume
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 88-
306 views DOI Abstract
2020
Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Mapping by Random Forest Base Classifier and Its Ensembles in a Semi-Arid Region of Iran
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 421-
386 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,678 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

34.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.