journal of evolutionary biology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#9001 / 33,987
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
90
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 месяц назад

journal of evolutionary biology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Индексации
ncbi ulakbim sci
Краткое название j evol biol
Сокращённое название j evol biol
ISSN 1420-9101
Цели и охват
URL https://academic.oup.com/jeb
Инструкции для авторов

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (45 total)

2020
Three-dimensional characterization of osteocyte volumes at multiple scales, and its relationship with bone biology and genome evolution in ray-finned fishes.
Davesne, Donald;Schmitt, Armin D;Fernandez, Vincent;Benson, Roger B J;Sanchez, Sophie;
326 views DOI Abstract
2008
Mutualism, hybrid inviability and speciation in a tropical ant-plant.
Léotard, G;Saltmarsh, A;Kjellberg, F;McKey, D;
Vol. 21 , No. 4 , pp. 1133-43
304 views DOI Abstract
2019
The role of functional constraints in nonrandom mating patterns for a dance fly with female ornaments.
Murray, Rosalind L;Gwynne, Darryl T;Bussière, Luc F;
Vol. 32 , No. 9 , pp. 984-993
288 views DOI Abstract
2011
Incipient allochronic speciation in the pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea pityocampa, Lepidoptera, Notodontidae)
Helena Santos;Christian Burban;Jérôme Rousselet;Jean-Pierre Rossi;Carole Kerdelhue;
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 146-58
179 views DOI Abstract
2011
Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: challenges and solutions
Catherine E. Grueber, Shinichi Nakagawa, Rebecca Laws, Ian G. Jamieson
37 views DOI Abstract
2013
Hybridization and speciation
Richard J. Abbott, Dirk C. Albach, Stephen W. Ansell, J. W. Arntzen, Stuart J. E. Baird, Nicolas Bierne, Janette W. Boughman, Alan Brelsford, C. Alex Buerkle, Richard J. A. Buggs, Roger K. Butlin, Ulf Dieckmann, Fabrice Eroukhmanoff, Andrea Grill, Sara Helms Cahan, Jo S. Hermansen, G. M. Hewitt, A. Hudson, Chris D. Jiggins, Julia C. Jones, Beat Keller, Tobias Marczewski, James Mallet, Paloma Martínez-Rodríguez, Markus Möst, Sean P. Mullen, Richard A. Nichols, Arne W. Nolte, Christian Parisod, Karin S. Pfennig, Amber M. Rice, Michael G. Ritchie, Bernhard Seifert, Carole M. Smadja, Rike Stelkens, Jacek M. Szymura, Risto Väinölä, Jochen B. W. Wolf, Dietmar Zinner
28 views DOI Abstract
2023
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
24 views DOI Abstract
2009
Adaptation to an extraordinary environment by evolution of phenotypic plasticity and genetic assimilation
Russell Lande
24 views DOI Abstract
2010
General quantitative genetic methods for comparative biology: phylogenies, taxonomies and multi-trait models for continuous and categorical characters
Jarrod D. Hadfield, Shinichi Nakagawa
23 views DOI Abstract
2008
Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios
Hanna Kokko, Michael D. Jennions
23 views DOI Abstract
View All 45 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
90
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.