journal of the formosan medical association = taiwan yi zhi | Journament

Journal Ranking

#846 / 33,939
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

journal of the formosan medical association = taiwan yi zhi

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj ulakbim sci ncbi
Short Name j formos med assoc
Abbreviated Name j formos med assoc
ISSN 0929-6646
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-the-formosan-medical-association
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (98 total)

2017
Minor mental disorders in Taiwanese healthcare workers and the associations with psychosocial work conditions
Cheng, Wan-Ju;Cheng, Yawen;
Vol. 116 , No. 4 , pp. 300-305
407 views Abstract
2018
On-treatment lipid profiles to predict the cardiovascular outcomes in ASCVD patients comorbid with chronic kidney disease – The multi-center T-SPARCLE registry study
Ho, Li-Ting;Lin, Fang-Ju;Tseng, Wei-Kung;Yin, Wei-Hsian;Wu, Yen-Wen;Li, Yi-Heng;Yeh, Hung-I.;Chen, Jaw-Wen;Wu, Chau-Chung;
Vol. 117 , No. 9 , pp. 814-824
397 views Abstract
2013
A feasible strategy of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for carriers with chromosomal translocation: Using blastocyst biopsy and array comparative genomic hybridization
Huang, Chu-Chun;Chang, Li-Jung;Tsai, Yi-Yi;Hung, Chia-Cheng;Fang, Mei-Ya;Su, Yi-Ning;Chen, Hsin-Fu;Chen, Shee-Uan;
Vol. 112 , No. 9 , pp. 537-544
394 views Abstract
2019
Social cognition in schizophrenia: A network-based approach to a Taiwanese version of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes test.
Li, Tai-Shan;Liu, Chih-Min;Liu, Chen-Chung;Hsieh, Ming H;Lin, Yi-Ting;Wang, En-Nan;Hwang, Tzung-Jeng;Chou, Tai-Li;
338 views DOI Abstract
2015
Evident cognitive impairments in seemingly recovered patients after midazolam-based light sedation during diagnostic endoscopy
Hsu, Yen-Hsuan;Lin, Feng-Sheng;Yang, Chi-Cheng;Lin, Chih-Peng;Hua, Mau-Sun;Sun, Wei-Zen;
Vol. 114 , No. 6 , pp. 489-497
338 views Abstract
2012
3d finite elements method (fem) analysis of basic process parameters in rotary piercing mill
;Z. Pater;J. Bartnicki;J. Kazanecki
Vol. 51 , No. 4 , pp. 501-504
329 views Abstract
2014
silicon production using long flaming coal and improvement of its quality indicators
;A. D. Mekhtiev;M. J. Tolymbekov;A. V. Kim;Zh. D. Zholdubaeva;D. K. Issin;A. Z. Issagulov;B. D. Issin
Vol. 53 , No. 4 , pp. 563-566
326 views Abstract
2019
Roles of Epstein–Barr virus viral load monitoring in the prediction of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in pediatric liver transplantation
Chen, H.
Vol. 118 , pp. 1362-1368
320 views DOI
2017
Severe aortic arch calcification predicts mortality in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis
Wu, Ching-Fang;Lee, Yee-Fan;Lee, Wen-Jeng;Su, Chi-Ting;Lee, Lukas Jyuhn-Hsiarn;Wu, Kwan-Dun;Chen, Pau-Chung;Kao, Tze-Wah;
Vol. 116 , No. 5 , pp. 366-372
318 views Abstract
2014
Response to: “Preimplantation genetic diagnosis strategy combining blastocyst biopsy and array comparative genomic hybridization for parents carrying chromosomal translocation”
Huang, Chu-Chun;
Vol. 113 , No. 11 , pp. 883-884
317 views
View All 98 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.