The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1197 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name J Assoc Physicians India
Abbreviated Name j assoc physicians india
ISSN 0004-5772
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.japi.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2012
LV remodeling and/or diastolic dysfunction in normal persons with BP of 120/80 mm hg or less and no other cardiovascular risk factors.
Mittal, S R;
Vol. 60 , pp. 18-20
357 views Abstract
2019
Efficacy of DPP4i as the Fourth Drug in the Management of Type2 Diabetes Mellitus in Asian Indians Poorly Controlled by Use of at least 3 Oral Antidiabetic Drugs.
Panikar, Vijay;Joshi, Shashank;Tiwaskar, Mangesh;Vadgama, Jimit;Nasikkar, Nikhil;Kamat, Tejas;Deogaonkar, Narayan;Walawalkar, Sanhita;Sachdev, Ishita;Jain, Chandani;Modh, Khushbu;Panikar, Krish;Kulkarni, Pallavi;Medidar, Rahul;
Vol. 67 , No. 8 , pp. 60-62
319 views Abstract
2019
Burden of Typhoid Fever in the Rural Field Practice Area of a Medical College, Bengaluru, India - A Descriptive Study.
Prithviraj, Renuka;H, Sushma;R, Lavanya;
Vol. 67 , No. 12 , pp. 87
311 views
2019
Generics and Biosimilars; A Step Towards Sustainable and Low Cost Health Care.
Gupta, Puneeta;Khan, Mehvish;
Vol. 67 , No. 11 , pp. 66-67
309 views Abstract
2015
Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Diabetic Patients - A Cross Sectional Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Mysore.
Babu, M Suresh;Gowdappa, H Basavana;Kalpana, T;Vidyalaxmi, K;Nikhil, B;Chakravarthy, T;
Vol. 63 , No. 8 , pp. 96
307 views Abstract
2020
Clinical and Epidemiological Features of SARS-CoV-2 Patients in SARI Ward of a Tertiary Care Centre in New Delhi.
Aggarwal, Amit;Shrivastava, Abhinav;Kumar, Abhinav;Ali, Adila;
Vol. 68 , No. 7 , pp. 19-26
284 views Abstract
2019
Evaluation of Multiplex PCR for Rapid Diagnosis of Female Genital Tuberculosis
Chopra, S.
Vol. 67 , pp. 21-24
278 views
2018
Socio-economical and Clinico-Radiological Profile of 474 MDR TB Cases of a Rural Medical College.
Jain, Swapnil;Varudkar, H G;Julka, Arti;Singapurwala, Mustafa;Khosla, Sourav;Shah, Bhavya;
Vol. 66 , No. 12 , pp. 14-18
274 views Abstract
2019
A ProspectIve, OpeN-Label, Randomized Study Comparing EffIcacy and Safety of Teneligliptin VErsus Sitagliptin in Indian Patients with Inadequately Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: INSITES Study.
Mohan, V;Ramu, M;Poongothai, S;Kasthuri, S;
Vol. 67 , No. 10 , pp. 14-19
271 views Abstract
2019
New Drugs and Clinical Trial Rules 2019, What is New? Our Views from Ethical Perspective.
G, Shivaprakash;Lc, Pallavi;
Vol. 67 , No. 10 , pp. 75-76
260 views Abstract
View All 13 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.