safety and health at work | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3986 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

safety and health at work

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj
Short Name saf health work
Abbreviated Name safety and health at work
ISSN 2093-7911
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/safety-and-health-at-work
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (32 total)

2017
Exploring Supervisor-Related Job Resources as Mediators between Supervisor Conflict and Job Attitudes in Hospital Employees
Elfering, Achim;Gerhardt, Christin;Grebner, Simone;Müller, Urs;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 19-28
733 views Abstract
2018
Evaluation of Respiratory Protection Program in Petrochemical Industries: Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process
Kolahi, Hadi;Jahangiri, Mehdi;Ghaem, Haleh;Rostamabadi, Akbar;Aghabeigi, Mandana;Farhadi, Payam;Kamalinia, Mojtaba;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 95-100
517 views Abstract
2016
Workplace Accidents and Work-related Illnesses of Household Waste Collectors
Jeong, Byung Yong;Lee, Sangbok;Lee, Jae Deuk;
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 138-142
506 views Abstract
2017
Strategies for Worksite Health Interventions to Employees with Elevated Risk of Chronic Diseases
Meng, Lu;Wolff, Marilyn B.;Mattick, Kelly A.;DeJoy, David M.;Wilson, Mark G.;Smith, Matthew Lee;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 117-129
424 views Abstract
2014
Nonfatal Occupational Injuries in Norwegian Farmers
Svendsen, Kristin;Aas, Oddfrid;Hilt, Bjørn;
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 147-151
379 views Abstract
2019
Exploring the Contributory Factors of Confined Space Accidents Using Accident Investigation Reports and Semistructured Interviews.
Naghavi K, Zahra;Mortazavi, Seyed B;Asilian M, Hassan;Hajizadeh, Ebrahim;
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 305-313
366 views DOI Abstract
2018
Effect of Nurses' Emotional Labor on Customer Orientation and Service Delivery: The Mediating Effects of Work Engagement and Burnout.
Han, Sang-Sook;Han, Jeong-Won;Kim, Yun-Hyung;
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 441-446
363 views DOI Abstract
2013
Effect of Occupational Health and Safety Management System on Work-Related Accident Rate and Differences of Occupational Health and Safety Management System Awareness between Managers in South Korea's Construction Industry
Yoon, Seok J.;Lin, Hsing K.;Chen, Gang;Yi, Shinjea;Choi, Jeawook;Rui, Zhenhua;
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 201-209
361 views Abstract
2019
Controlling Painters' Exposure to Volatile Organic Solvents in the Automotive Sector of Southern Colombia.
Castaño, Belky P;Ramírez, Vladimir;Cancelado, Julio A;
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 355-361
350 views DOI Abstract
2019
Contributors to Fatigue of Mine Workers in the South African Gold and Platinum Sector.
Pelders, Jodi;Nelson, Gill;
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 188-195
305 views DOI Abstract
View All 32 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.