Indexed in Journament

scientific annals of the danube delta institute

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #18,513 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
42 Articles
Scores higher than 36.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name scientific annals of the danube delta institute
Abbreviated Name scientific annals of the danube delta institute

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 66.0
Community Impact 9.3
Content Distribution 53.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for scientific annals of the danube delta institute
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.1
Accessibility 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 66.0 31.2
Community Impact 9.3 13.4
Content Distribution 53.9 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (42)

2018
Study of pike-perch (Sander lucioperca) fishery from Razim Lake, Danube delta Romania
Vol. 23 , pp. 23-30
328 views Abstract
1977
hosea jaffe. del tribalismo al socialismo. méxico : siglo xxi. 1976
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. -
302 views
1980
fred hugo sanderson. japan's food prospects and policies. washington : brookings institution, 1978. 99 p.
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 251-252
297 views
1979
una educación creadora para las sociedades africanas independientes
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 323-337
248 views
1983
antropología, ideología, colonialismo
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 337-368
241 views
1989
stephanie urdang. and still they dance. nueva york, n.y. : monthly review press, 1989
Vol. 24 , No. 3 , pp. 501-503
228 views
2018
Study of pike-perch (Sander lucioperca) fishery from Razim Lake, Danube delta Romania
Vol. 23 , pp. 23-30
328 views Abstract
2014
diverse sex-generic identities as a category of subalternity
Vol. 49 , No. 3 , pp. 723-754
108 views Abstract
2012
perspectivas presentes y futuras de la cultura china
Vol. 47 , No. 2 , pp. 405-426
29 views
2010
el ayatollah al-ozma hussein-alí montazerí y el movimiento reformista en irán
Vol. 45 , No. 2 , pp. 451-470
101 views
2006
xulio ríos. taiwán, el problema de china. madrid : los libros de la catarata, 2005. 216 p.
Vol. 41 , No. 3 , pp. 530-533
204 views
2005
la razón del prodigio : lógica de las metáforas de nagarjuna
Vol. 40 , No. 3 , pp. 519-537
197 views
1997
la crisis de la historia de la humanidad en ruanda, zaire y burundi
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 369-392
140 views
1997
el futuro político de hong kong
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 129-146
132 views
Journament Score
33.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #18,513 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

33.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

66.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

53.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.