humaniora | Journament

Journal Ranking

#7281 / 33,980
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

humaniora

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name humaniora
Abbreviated Name humaniora
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2017
design of a prototype generator based on piezoelectric power generation for vibration energy harvesting
;Lumbumba Taty-Etienne Nyamayoka;Gloria Adedayo Adewumi;Freddie Liswaniso Inambao
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. -
504 views DOI Abstract
2015
A Brief Analysis of Errors and Their Causes of Indonesian Students Learning Chinese Characters 浅析印尼留学生学习汉字的偏误及原因
Anggreani, Lydia;
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 334-338
381 views Abstract
2011
Peran Iklan Layanan Masyarakat dalam Sosialisasi Program Busway oleh Pemprov Dki: Proses Sosialisasi Program Busway
Neonisa, Didier;
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 1446-1466
362 views Abstract
2017
Social-Economic Immobility: A Study of Fishermen’s Struggle among Corporation Powers in the East Coast of Kalimantan, Indonesia
Setiadi, Setiadi;Yuliono, Agus;Satiti, Sonyaruri;
Vol. 29 , No. 1 , pp. 24-36
317 views Abstract
2017
measuring the indirect costs associated with the establishment of a wind farm: an application of the contingent valuation method
;Mario du Preez;Greig Menzies;Michael Sale;Stephen Hosking
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 2-7
283 views DOI Abstract
2017
solar radiation analysis and regression coefficients for the vhembe region, limpopo province, south africa
;Sophie T. Malaudzi;Vaithianathaswami Sankaran;Meena D. Lysko
Vol. 24 , No. 3 , pp. 2-7
274 views DOI Abstract
2017
low-income resident’s preferences for the location of wind turbine farms in the eastern cape province, south africa
;Jessica Hosking;Mario du Preez;Gary Sharp
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 10-18
270 views DOI Abstract
2017
Differences in Perception and Diction on Two Translations Lelaki Tua dan Laut from Ernest Hemingway’s The Old Man and The Sea
Rahayu, Lina Meilinawati;
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 300-314
270 views Abstract
2017
the sensitivity of the south african industrial sector’s electricity consumption to electricity price fluctuations
;Roula Inglesi-Lotz
Vol. 25 , No. 4 , pp. 2-10
258 views DOI Abstract
2015
THE CULTURAL RELEVANCE OF INDONESIAN PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS AS CONTRASTED WITH POLISH
Wiatrowski, Przemysław;
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. 14-26
254 views Abstract
View All 20 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.