Indexed in Journament

Journal of clinical nursing

ISSN 1365-2702· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
43.4 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #536 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
55 Articles
Scores higher than 98.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name J Clin Nurs
Abbreviated Name j clin nurs
ISSN 1365-2702
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/13652702

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.2 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 20.0 5.8
Diversity 66.7 24.5
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 10.0 5.8
Content Distribution 75.9 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (55)

2019
Australian parents' experiences when discussing their child's overweight and obesity with the Maternal and Child Health nurse: A qualitative study.
Hardy, Kelly;Hooker, Leesa;Ridgway, Lael;Edvardsson, Kristina;
Vol. 28 , No. 19-20 , pp. 3610-3617
515 views DOI Abstract
2019
Influence of workplace incivility on the quality of nursing care.
Alshehry, Abdualrahman Saeed;Alquwez, Nahed;Almazan, Joseph;Namis, Ibrahim Mohammed;Cruz, Jonas Preposi;
494 views DOI Abstract
2018
The centrality of the nurse-patient relationship: A Scandinavian perspective.
Uhrenfeldt, Lisbeth;Sørensen, Erik Elgaard;Bahnsen, Iben Bøgh;Pedersen, Preben Ulrich;
Vol. 27 , No. 15-16 , pp. 3197-3204
493 views DOI Abstract
2019
Occupational stress facing Nurse Academics - A mixed-methods systematic review.
Singh, Charanjit;Cross, Wendy;Munro, Ian;Jackson, Debra;
442 views DOI Abstract
2018
Quality of nursing documentation: Paper-based health records versus electronic-based health records
Akhu-Zaheya, L.
Vol. 27 , pp. e578-e589
433 views DOI
2019
Domestic violence and suicide attempts among married women: A case-control study.
Rahmani, Farzad;Salmasi, Shiva;Rahmani, Farnaz;Bird, Jamie;Asghari, Elnaz;Robai, Navide;Asghari Jafarabadi, Mohammad;Gholizadeh, Leila;
432 views DOI Abstract
2020
Becoming a Good Nurse - Socialisation of Newly Employed Nurses into the Oncological Clinic.
Pettersson, Alexandra;Glasdam, Stinne;
428 views DOI Abstract
2020
Family caregivers' lived experiences of caring for epidermolysis bullosa patients: a phenomenological study.
Wu, Yeh-Hsun;Sun, Fan-Ko;Lee, Pei-Yu;
424 views DOI Abstract
2019
Exploring nursing students' use of the Fundamentals of Care framework in case-based work.
Voldbjerg, Siri Lygum;Lyng Larsen, Karen;Nielsen, Gitte;Laugesen, Britt;
421 views DOI Abstract
2020
Nurse practitioners' perceptions of their ability to enact leadership in hospital care.
van Kraaij, Julia;van Oostveen, Catharina;Vermeulen, Hester;Heinen, Maud;Huis, Anita;Adriaansen, Marian;Peters, Jeroen;
Vol. 29 , No. 3-4 , pp. 447-458
420 views DOI Abstract
2023
Using chatbots like ChatGPT to support nursing practice.
Scerri, Anthony;Morin, Karen H;
196 views DOI
2020
Nurses’ experiences regarding shift patterns in isolation wards during the COVID-19 pandemic in China: A qualitative study
Gao, X.
Vol. 29 , pp. 4270-4280
41 views DOI
2020
The Nursing Practice Environment and Nurse Job Outcomes: A Path Analysis of Survey Data.
Ambani, Zainab;Kutney-Lee, Ann;Lake, Eileen T;
411 views DOI Abstract
2020
Becoming a Good Nurse - Socialisation of Newly Employed Nurses into the Oncological Clinic.
Pettersson, Alexandra;Glasdam, Stinne;
428 views DOI Abstract
2020
What use are words at a time like this?
Darbyshire, Philip;
375 views DOI Abstract
2020
Family caregivers' lived experiences of caring for epidermolysis bullosa patients: a phenomenological study.
Wu, Yeh-Hsun;Sun, Fan-Ko;Lee, Pei-Yu;
424 views DOI Abstract
2020
Delirium Point Prevalence Studies in Inpatient Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Koirala, Binu;Hansen, Bryan R;Hosie, Annmarie;Budhathoki, Chakra;Seal, Stella;Beaman, Adam;Davidson, Patricia M;
281 views DOI Abstract
2020
When a common language is missing; nurse-mother communication in the NICU. A qualitative study.
Kynoe, Nina Margrethe;Fugelseth, Drude;Hanssen, Ingrid;
399 views DOI Abstract
2020
The role of nurses and midwives in the provision of abortion care: a scoping review.
Mainey, Lydia;O'Mullan, Catherine;Reid-Searl, Kerry;Taylor, Annabel;Baird, Kathleen;
309 views DOI Abstract
2020
Advance care planning for patients with cancer in palliative care: A scoping review from a professional perspective.
Kuusisto, Anne;Santavirta, Jenni;Saranto, Kaija;Korhonen, Päivi;Haavisto, Elina;
348 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
43.4/100 · Below Average
Ranked #536 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

66.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

75.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.