Journal of clinical nursing | Journament

Journal Ranking

#218 / 33,944
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Journal of clinical nursing

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name J Clin Nurs
Abbreviated Name j clin nurs
ISSN 1365-2702
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/13652702
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (55 total)

2019
Australian parents' experiences when discussing their child's overweight and obesity with the Maternal and Child Health nurse: A qualitative study.
Hardy, Kelly;Hooker, Leesa;Ridgway, Lael;Edvardsson, Kristina;
Vol. 28 , No. 19-20 , pp. 3610-3617
449 views DOI Abstract
2019
Influence of workplace incivility on the quality of nursing care.
Alshehry, Abdualrahman Saeed;Alquwez, Nahed;Almazan, Joseph;Namis, Ibrahim Mohammed;Cruz, Jonas Preposi;
410 views DOI Abstract
2018
The centrality of the nurse-patient relationship: A Scandinavian perspective.
Uhrenfeldt, Lisbeth;Sørensen, Erik Elgaard;Bahnsen, Iben Bøgh;Pedersen, Preben Ulrich;
Vol. 27 , No. 15-16 , pp. 3197-3204
409 views DOI Abstract
2019
Occupational stress facing Nurse Academics - A mixed-methods systematic review.
Singh, Charanjit;Cross, Wendy;Munro, Ian;Jackson, Debra;
385 views DOI Abstract
2018
Quality of nursing documentation: Paper-based health records versus electronic-based health records
Akhu-Zaheya, L.
Vol. 27 , pp. e578-e589
385 views DOI
2019
Domestic violence and suicide attempts among married women: A case-control study.
Rahmani, Farzad;Salmasi, Shiva;Rahmani, Farnaz;Bird, Jamie;Asghari, Elnaz;Robai, Navide;Asghari Jafarabadi, Mohammad;Gholizadeh, Leila;
383 views DOI Abstract
2020
Becoming a Good Nurse - Socialisation of Newly Employed Nurses into the Oncological Clinic.
Pettersson, Alexandra;Glasdam, Stinne;
370 views DOI Abstract
2020
Nurse practitioners' perceptions of their ability to enact leadership in hospital care.
van Kraaij, Julia;van Oostveen, Catharina;Vermeulen, Hester;Heinen, Maud;Huis, Anita;Adriaansen, Marian;Peters, Jeroen;
Vol. 29 , No. 3-4 , pp. 447-458
360 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Nursing Practice Environment and Nurse Job Outcomes: A Path Analysis of Survey Data.
Ambani, Zainab;Kutney-Lee, Ann;Lake, Eileen T;
356 views DOI Abstract
2020
Family caregivers' lived experiences of caring for epidermolysis bullosa patients: a phenomenological study.
Wu, Yeh-Hsun;Sun, Fan-Ko;Lee, Pei-Yu;
353 views DOI Abstract
View All 55 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.