Indexed in Journament

the journal of the american academy of psychiatry and the law

ISSN 1943-3662· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.6/100
Journament Score
#10,242
Journament Rank
20
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name j am acad psychiatry law
Abbreviated Name j am acad psychiatry law
ISSN 1943-3662

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (20)

2011
cytotoxic effect of ethanolic extract of sarang semut (myrmecodia pendens) on hela cervix cancer cell line in vitro experimental study
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 112-120
451 views DOI Abstract
2011
effectiveness of gentamicin and chloramfenicol for infant dacryocistitis
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 105-111
433 views DOI Abstract
2011
2012
cost-effectiveness analysis of combined use of oral antihypertensive outpatient hypertension in regional general hospital tugurejo semarang period 2007
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 124-133
405 views DOI Abstract
2020
Clinician Perceptions of Implementing the Cultural Formulation Interview on a Mixed Forensic Unit.
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
Extreme Overvalued Belief and the Legacy of Carl Wernicke.
Vol. 47 , No. 2 , pp. 180-187
349 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing the Risk of Inpatient Violence in Autism Spectrum Disorder.
328 views DOI Abstract
2013
overview of the incidence and risk factors for nosocomial infections using a geographic information system maps
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 82-89
310 views DOI Abstract
2017
red ginger (zingiber officinale var. amarum) infusion increases concentration of luteinizing hormone and testosterone in male rats
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 54-58
285 views DOI Abstract
2020
Clinician Perceptions of Implementing the Cultural Formulation Interview on a Mixed Forensic Unit.
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing the Risk of Inpatient Violence in Autism Spectrum Disorder.
328 views DOI Abstract
2019
Extreme Overvalued Belief and the Legacy of Carl Wernicke.
Vol. 47 , No. 2 , pp. 180-187
349 views DOI Abstract
2017
calorie restriction, stem cells, and rejuvenation approach
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 40-42
161 views DOI Abstract
2017
red ginger (zingiber officinale var. amarum) infusion increases concentration of luteinizing hormone and testosterone in male rats
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 54-58
285 views DOI Abstract
2016
formulation and physical test of ethanolic extract sambiloto leaves (andrographis paniculata) ointment
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 56-60
131 views DOI Abstract
2016
acute toxicity test of soursop leaves (annona muricata) on liver and kidney of switzerland mice
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 48-51
205 views DOI Abstract
2016
does androgen hormone influences sexual orientation?
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 40-42
194 views DOI Abstract
2013
the effects of chronic exposure to airport related noise on blood pressure (a case study of area nearby ahmad yani international airport, semarang)
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 94-97
263 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.