the journal of the american academy of psychiatry and the law | Journament

Journal Ranking

#7448 / 33,982
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 12 hours ago

the journal of the american academy of psychiatry and the law

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name j am acad psychiatry law
Abbreviated Name j am acad psychiatry law
ISSN 1943-3662
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2011
cytotoxic effect of ethanolic extract of sarang semut (myrmecodia pendens) on hela cervix cancer cell line in vitro experimental study
;Dina Fatmawati;Prista Karina Puspitasari;Iwang Yusuf
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 112-120
445 views DOI Abstract
2011
effectiveness of gentamicin and chloramfenicol for infant dacryocistitis
;Christina Indrajati;Norma D. Handojo;Winarto Winarto
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 105-111
424 views DOI Abstract
2011
effect of jinten hitam seeds oil (nigella sativa l.) in adenocarsinoma mammae c3h mice in vivo an experimental study on c3h mice inoculated with cancerous tissue
;Agus Suprijono;Sumarno Sumarno;Hanugalih Hanugalih
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 129-134
407 views DOI Abstract
2012
cost-effectiveness analysis of combined use of oral antihypertensive outpatient hypertension in regional general hospital tugurejo semarang period 2007
;Willi Wahyu Timur;Tri Murti Andayani;Riyanta Aribawa
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 124-133
398 views DOI Abstract
2020
Clinician Perceptions of Implementing the Cultural Formulation Interview on a Mixed Forensic Unit.
Aggarwal, Neil K;Lam, Peter;Diaz, Samantha;Cruz, Amanda G;Lewis-Fernández, Roberto;
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
Extreme Overvalued Belief and the Legacy of Carl Wernicke.
Rahman, Tahir;Meloy, J Reid;Bauer, Robert;
Vol. 47 , No. 2 , pp. 180-187
342 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing the Risk of Inpatient Violence in Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Girardi, Alessandra;Hancock-Johnson, Ella;Thomas, Carlo;Wallang, Paul M;
321 views DOI Abstract
2013
overview of the incidence and risk factors for nosocomial infections using a geographic information system maps
;Rochady Setianto;Lutfan Lazuardi;Andaru Dahesihdewi
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 82-89
296 views DOI Abstract
2015
the correlation between duration of employment, body posture and smoking habit on low back pain incidence an analytic observational study among taxi driver in semarang municipality
;Syifa Dian Firmanita;Ika Rosdiana;Ulfah Dian Indrayani
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 17-20
276 views DOI Abstract
2017
red ginger (zingiber officinale var. amarum) infusion increases concentration of luteinizing hormone and testosterone in male rats
;Alida Nihayah;Taufiqurrahman Nasihun;Israhnanto Isradji
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 54-58
273 views DOI Abstract
View All 20 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.