Indexed in Journament

Medical physics

ISSN 2473-4209· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.5/100
Journament Score
#6,446
Journament Rank
56
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Med Phys
Abbreviated Name med phys
ISSN 2473-4209
URL https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/24734209

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (56)

2019
3D printing for rapid prototyping of low-Z/density ionization chamber arrays.
485 views DOI Abstract
2019
A 3D printed modular phantom for quality assurance of image-guided small animal irradiators: Design, imaging experiments, and Monte Carlo simulations.
Vol. 46 , No. 5 , pp. 2015-2024
436 views DOI Abstract
2020
A Novel Anthropomorphic Multimodality Phantom for MRI-Based Radiotherapy Quality Assurance Testing.
425 views DOI Abstract
2015
Experimental depth dose curves of a 67.5 MeV proton beam for benchmarking and validation of Monte Carlo simulation.
Vol. 42 , No. 7 , pp. 4199-210
411 views DOI Abstract
2019
Monte Carlo simulations of out-of-field skin dose due to spiralling contaminant electrons in a perpendicular magnetic field.
Vol. 46 , No. 3 , pp. 1467-1477
395 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cherenkov emission-based external radiotherapy dosimetry: I. Formalism and feasibility.
Vol. 46 , No. 5 , pp. 2370-2382
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Distributed Deep Learning Across Multi-site Datasets for Generalized CT Hemorrhage Segmentation.
383 views DOI Abstract
2001
A theoretical model for event statistics in microdosimetry. II: Nonuniform distribution of heavy ion tracks.
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 997-1005
363 views Abstract
2024
A comprehensive lung CT landmark pair dataset for evaluating deformable image registration algorithms.
91 views DOI Abstract
2020
A failure modes and effects analysis quality management framework for image-guided small animal irradiators: A change in paradigm for radiation biology.
Vol. 47 , No. 4 , pp. 2013-2022
126 views DOI Abstract
2020
A technique for spatial resolution improvement in helium-beam radiography.
327 views DOI Abstract
2020
Spatially-guided non-local mean approach for denoising of PET images.
309 views DOI Abstract
2020
Real-time 4D-MRI-based internal target volume definition for moving lung tumors.
225 views DOI Abstract
2020
A Novel Anthropomorphic Multimodality Phantom for MRI-Based Radiotherapy Quality Assurance Testing.
425 views DOI Abstract
2019
Radionuclide spatial distribution and dose deposition for in vitro assessments of Pb-αVCAM-1 targeted alpha therapy.
265 views DOI Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

41.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.