Indexed in Journament

Medical physics

ISSN 2473-4209· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,647 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
56 Articles
Scores higher than 80.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Med Phys
Abbreviated Name med phys
ISSN 2473-4209
URL https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/24734209

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Medical physics
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 20.0 9.2
Diversity 31.5 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 14.3 7.8
Content Distribution 73.5 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (56)

2019
3D printing for rapid prototyping of low-Z/density ionization chamber arrays.
496 views DOI Abstract
2019
A 3D printed modular phantom for quality assurance of image-guided small animal irradiators: Design, imaging experiments, and Monte Carlo simulations.
Vol. 46 , No. 5 , pp. 2015-2024
454 views DOI Abstract
2020
A Novel Anthropomorphic Multimodality Phantom for MRI-Based Radiotherapy Quality Assurance Testing.
433 views DOI Abstract
2015
Experimental depth dose curves of a 67.5 MeV proton beam for benchmarking and validation of Monte Carlo simulation.
Vol. 42 , No. 7 , pp. 4199-210
426 views DOI Abstract
2019
Monte Carlo simulations of out-of-field skin dose due to spiralling contaminant electrons in a perpendicular magnetic field.
Vol. 46 , No. 3 , pp. 1467-1477
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
Distributed Deep Learning Across Multi-site Datasets for Generalized CT Hemorrhage Segmentation.
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cherenkov emission-based external radiotherapy dosimetry: I. Formalism and feasibility.
Vol. 46 , No. 5 , pp. 2370-2382
395 views DOI Abstract
2001
A theoretical model for event statistics in microdosimetry. II: Nonuniform distribution of heavy ion tracks.
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 997-1005
378 views Abstract
2024
A comprehensive lung CT landmark pair dataset for evaluating deformable image registration algorithms.
100 views DOI Abstract
2020
A failure modes and effects analysis quality management framework for image-guided small animal irradiators: A change in paradigm for radiation biology.
Vol. 47 , No. 4 , pp. 2013-2022
143 views DOI Abstract
2020
A technique for spatial resolution improvement in helium-beam radiography.
340 views DOI Abstract
2020
Spatially-guided non-local mean approach for denoising of PET images.
324 views DOI Abstract
2020
Real-time 4D-MRI-based internal target volume definition for moving lung tumors.
234 views DOI Abstract
2020
A Novel Anthropomorphic Multimodality Phantom for MRI-Based Radiotherapy Quality Assurance Testing.
433 views DOI Abstract
2019
Radionuclide spatial distribution and dose deposition for in vitro assessments of Pb-αVCAM-1 targeted alpha therapy.
278 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,647 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

37.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

31.5/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

14.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.