brain and cognition | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3028 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

brain and cognition

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name brain cogn
Abbreviated Name brain cogn
ISSN 1090-2147
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/brain-and-cognition
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (12 total)

2020
Maternal reading and fluency abilities are associated with diffusion properties of ventral and dorsal white matter tracts in their preschool-age children.
Farah, Rola;Dudley, Jon;Hutton, John;Horowitz-Kraus, Tzipi;
Vol. 140 , pp. 105532
340 views DOI Abstract
2019
Independent ERP predictors of affective priming underline the importance of depth of prime and target processing and implicit affect misattribution.
Seib-Pfeifer, Laura-Effi;Gibbons, Henning;
Vol. 136 , pp. 103595
328 views DOI Abstract
2019
Short- and long-term memory for pitch and non-pitch contours: Insights from congenital amusia.
Graves, Jackson E;Pralus, Agathe;Fornoni, Lesly;Oxenham, Andrew J;Caclin, Anne;Tillmann, Barbara;
Vol. 136 , pp. 103614
325 views DOI Abstract
2003
Differential brain responses when applying criterion attribute versus family resemblance rule learning.
Tracy, J I;Mohamed, F;Faro, S;Pinus, A;Tiver, R;Harvan, J;Bloomer, C;Pyrros, A;Madi, S;
Vol. 51 , No. 3 , pp. 276-86
321 views Abstract
2019
'Honey, shall I change the baby? - Well done, choose another one': ERP and time-frequency correlates of humor processing.
Canal, Paolo;Bischetti, Luca;Di Paola, Simona;Bertini, Chiara;Ricci, Irene;Bambini, Valentina;
Vol. 132 , pp. 41-55
314 views DOI Abstract
2019
Young children's sentence comprehension: Neural correlates of syntax-semantic competition
Strotseva-Feinschmidt, A.
Vol. 134 , pp. 110-121
306 views DOI
2020
Reductions in perceived stress following Transcendental Meditation practice are associated with increased brain regional connectivity at rest.
Avvenuti, Giulia;Leo, Andrea;Cecchetti, Luca;Franco, Maria Fatima;Travis, Frederick;Caramella, Davide;Bernardi, Giulio;Ricciardi, Emiliano;Pietrini, Pietro;
Vol. 139 , pp. 105517
297 views DOI Abstract
2019
The embodiment of language in tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease patients
Nisticò, R.
Vol. 135 , pp. 0-0
278 views DOI
2012
“servir al rey en la monarquía de los austrias. medios, fines y logros del servicio al soberano en los siglos xvi y xvii”
;José Eloy HORTAL MUÑOZ
, No. 5 , pp. 170-173
197 views
2013
[reseña]“vida cotidiana en la españa de la ilustración”
;Gloria ALONSO DE LA HIGUERA
, No. 6 , pp. 233-238
171 views
View All 12 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.