epidemiology and infection | Journament

Journal Ranking

#376 / 33,959
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

epidemiology and infection

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name epidemiol infect
Abbreviated Name epidemiol infect
ISSN 1469-4409
Aim and Scope
URL http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=HYG
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (11 total)

2007
Optimizing typhoid fever case definitions by combining serological tests in a large population study in Hechi City, China
Dong B;Galindo CM;Shin E;Acosta CJ;Page AL;Wang M;Kim D;Ochiai RL;Park J;Ali M;Seidlein LV;Xu Z;Yang J;Clemens JD;;
Vol. 135 , No. 6 , pp. -
416 views Abstract
2007
Incidence of bacterial meningitis in Asia using enhanced CSF testing: polymerase chain reaction, latex agglutination and culture
Kennedy WA;Chang SJ;Purdy K;LE T;Kilgore PE;Kim JS;Anh DD;Huong PL;Dong BQ;Tan DM;Clemens JD;Ward JI;;
Vol. 135 , No. 7 , pp. -
373 views Abstract
2019
Letter to editor in response to Has prevalence in young women in England, Scotland and Wales changed? Evidence from national probability surveys.
White, P J;Lewis, J;
Vol. 147 , pp. e271
362 views DOI
2019
Seasonality and zoonotic foodborne pathogens in Canada: relationships between climate and Campylobacter, E. coli and Salmonella in meat products.
Smith, B A;Meadows, S;Meyers, R;Parmley, E J;Fazil, A;
Vol. 147 , pp. e190
352 views DOI Abstract
2019
Indirect costs associated with deaths of children aged 0-14 years from measles in a weak health system and conflict and fragile zone: the case of Somalia.
Da'ar, Omar B;
Vol. 147 , pp. e252
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Response to Kounali .'s letter of response].
White, P J;Lewis, J;
Vol. 147 , pp. e273
330 views DOI
2019
A history of FMD research and control programmes in Southeast Asia: lessons from the past informing the future.
Blacksell, Stuart D;Siengsanan-Lamont, Jarunee;Kamolsiripichaiporn, Somjai;Gleeson, Laurence J;Windsor, Peter A;
Vol. 147 , pp. e171
316 views DOI Abstract
2010
A systematic review of outbreak and non-outbreak studies of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli causing community-acquired infections
George DB;Manges AR;;
Vol. 138 , No. 12 , pp. -
289 views Abstract
2012
zdeňka schejbalová: Česko-francouzský a francouzsko-český slovník základní terminologie speciální pedagogiky
;Gregor Perko
Vol. 4 , No. 1-2 , pp. -
281 views DOI Abstract
2018
Cost-effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori screening followed by eradication treatment for employees in Japan
Kowada, A.
Vol. 146 , pp. 1834-1840
259 views DOI
View All 11 Articles
44
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.